Seismic design of bridge structures with allowance for large relative girder movements to avoid pounding

SUMMARY Pounding between bridge girders have been observed in almost all previous major earthquakes. This is because the gap size of conventional bridge expansion joint is usually only a few centimetres, which is not sufficient to preclude poundings owing to large relative displacements between bridge girders caused by the effect of varying vibration properties of adjacent bridge spans, varying ground motions at bridge supports and varying soil-structure interaction (SSI). In this work a new design of bridge expansion joint is introduced. Instead of tolerating pounding and providing possible mitigating measures, this new design approach enables large movement between bridge girders which makes a complete pounding preclusion possible. The new expansion joint is called Modular Expansion Joint (MEJ). The large movability is achieved by installing a number of small gaps in the joint. In this study, the MEJ gap size required to completely avoid girder pounding is investigated. The most significant influence factors -the varying vibration properties of adjacent bridge spans, the effect of SSI and ground motion spatial variation on expansion joint size required to preclude pounding- are calculated. Discussions on the relative importance of various structural and ground motion properties in generating relative displacements of adjacent bridge girders are made.

[1]  Robert J. Dexter,et al.  PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR MODULAR BRIDGE JOINT SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[2]  Joseph Penzien,et al.  Evaluation of building separation distance required to prevent pounding during strong earthquakes , 1997 .

[3]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  EFFECT OF POUNDING AND RESTRAINERS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MULTIPLE-FRAME BRIDGES , 2002 .

[4]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Seismic Response of Adjacent Buildings with Similar or Different Dynamic Characteristics , 1994 .

[5]  S. Anagnostopoulos Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes , 1988 .

[6]  Nawawi Chouw,et al.  Influence of soil-structure interaction on pounding response of adjacent buildings due to near-source earthquakes , 2002 .

[7]  Mark Yashinsky,et al.  Fundamentals of seismic protection for bridges , 2003 .

[8]  A. Filiatrault,et al.  The Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake (The great Hanshin earthquake) of 17 January 1995 , 1995 .

[9]  Nawawi Chouw,et al.  Significance of SSI and non-uniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response II: Effect on response with modular expansion joint , 2008 .

[10]  H. Hao,et al.  Seismic response of multi‐span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion , 2002 .

[11]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  The Yogyakarta Earthquake of May 27, 2006 , 2007 .

[12]  Jay Shen,et al.  ESTIMATION OF RELATIVE DISPLACEMENT OF TWO ADJACENT ASYMMETRIC STRUCTURES , 2001 .

[13]  Yasunao Matsumoto,et al.  Mechanism of noise generation from a modular expansion joint under vehicle passage , 2007 .

[14]  Hong Hao,et al.  Spatial ground motion effect on relative displacement of adjacent building structures , 1999 .

[15]  K. Spiliopoulos,et al.  An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings , 1992 .

[16]  John Douglas,et al.  Near-field horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motions , 2003 .

[17]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Highway Bridges and Traffic Management , 1995 .

[18]  Hong Hao,et al.  A parametric study of the required seating length for bridge decks during earthquake , 1998 .

[19]  Ping Zhu,et al.  Evaluation of pounding countermeasures and serviceability of elevated bridges during seismic excitation using 3D modeling , 2004 .

[20]  Hong Hao,et al.  Estimation of required separations between adjacent structures under spatial ground motions , 1998 .

[21]  J. Enrique Luco,et al.  Optimal damping between two adjacent elastic structures , 1998 .

[22]  P. J. Moss,et al.  Seismic pounding of a case of adjacent multiple-storey buildings of differing total heights considering soil flexibility effects , 2001 .

[23]  Anat Ruangrassamee,et al.  Control of nonlinear bridge response with pounding effect by variable dampers , 2003 .

[24]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Seismic response of isolated bridges with soil-structure interaction , 2003 .

[25]  Ping Zhu,et al.  Modelling three‐dimensional non‐linear seismic performance of elevated bridges with emphasis on pounding of girders , 2002 .

[26]  H. Hao Arch responses to correlated multiple excitations , 1993 .

[27]  J. Penzien,et al.  Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on smart-1 array data , 1989 .