Automated geometry measurement of wheel rims based on optical 3D metrology

One of the economically most important branches is the automotive industry with their component suppliers. The high degree of automation in manufacturing processes, requires automated control and quality assurance equally. In this scope, we present a complex 3D measuring device, consisting of multiple optical 3D sensors, which is designed to capture the geometry of wheel rims. The principal challenge for automated measurements is the variety of rims with respect to design, dimensions and the production flow. Together with connected conveyers, the system automatically sorts good rims without interrupting the manufacturing process. In this work we consider three major steps. At first we discuss the application of the used 3D sensors and the underlying measuring principles for the 3D geometry acquisition. Therefore, we examine the hardware architecture, which is needed to fulfill the requirements concerning to the variety of shapes and to the measuring conditions in industrial environments. In the second part we focus on the automated calibration procedure to integrate and combine the data from the set of sensors. Finally, we introduce the algorithms for the 3D geometry extraction and the mathematical methods which are used for the data preprocessing and interpretation.

[1]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Superquadrics-based 3D object representation of automotive parts utilizing part decomposition , 2003, International Conference on Quality Control by Artificial Vision.

[2]  Tobias Isenberg,et al.  Evaluation and Correction of Laser-Scanned Point Clouds , 2005 .

[3]  Sung Joon Ahn,et al.  Geometric Fitting of Line, Plane, Circle, Sphere, and Ellipse , 1999 .

[4]  Ralph R. Martin,et al.  Faithful Least-Squares Fitting of Spheres, Cylinders, Cones and Tori for Reliable Segmentation , 1998, ECCV.

[5]  Sunghee Choi,et al.  The power crust, unions of balls, and the medial axis transform , 2001, Comput. Geom..

[6]  Marc Alexa,et al.  Computing and Rendering Point Set Surfaces , 2003, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[7]  Diane L. Souvaine,et al.  Transformations and algorithms for least sum of squares hypersphere fitting , 2004, CCCG.

[8]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Probabilistic plane fitting in 3D and an application to robotic mapping , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[9]  Markus Gross,et al.  Point-Based Graphics , 2007 .

[10]  Gabriel Taubin,et al.  The ball-pivoting algorithm for surface reconstruction , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  R. Frühwirth,et al.  A review of fast circle and helix fitting , 2003 .

[12]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm , 2001, Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling.

[13]  Tamal K. Dey,et al.  Shape Segmentation and Matching from Noisy Point Clouds , 2004, PBG.

[14]  T. S. Michael,et al.  Sphere of influence graphs in general metric spaces , 1999 .

[15]  Nikolai I. Chernov,et al.  Least Squares Fitting of Circles , 2005, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[16]  Tim Weyrich,et al.  Post-processing of Scanned 3D Surface Data , 2004, PBG.

[17]  Heinz Hügli,et al.  Fast ICP Algorithms for Shape Registration , 2002, DAGM-Symposium.

[18]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[19]  Craig M. Shakarji,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting Algorithms of the NIST Algorithm Testing System , 1998, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.