Aromatic side‐chain interactions in proteins. I. Main structural features

In a data set of 593 nonhomologous proteins from the PDB, we have analyzed the pairing of phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan, and histidine residues with their closest aromatic partner. The frequency distribution of the shortest interatomic distance of partners is bimodal with a sharp peak at ∼3.8 Å and a wider one at a longer distance. Only the 3.8 Å peak corresponds to direct ring–ring interactions thus aromatic pairs. The aromatic pairs were separated into two classes, near‐sequence pairs and far‐sequence pairs. Near sequence pairs stabilize local structure, and far‐sequence pairs stabilize tertiary structure. Far‐sequence pairs (74% of all pairs) mainly bridge two β‐strands, followed by pairs that bridge a β‐strand and a helix, and pairs that bridge a β‐strand and a random coil structure. Pairs that bridge helices are rare. The secondary structure of the near‐sequence pairs depends on the partner distance in the sequence. When the partners are 1, 3, or 4 residues apart in the sequence, pairs are mostly found in helical structures. When the partners are two apart, pairs are mostly found in the same β‐strand. Analysis of the frequency of near sequence pairs supports the hypothesis that aromatic pairing occurs after, rather than before, the formation of secondary structures. Proteins 2002;48:628–634. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Annick Thomas,et al.  Pex, analytical tools for PDB files. II. H‐Pex: Noncanonical H‐bonds in α‐helices , 2001, Proteins.

[2]  G. McGaughey,et al.  pi-Stacking interactions. Alive and well in proteins. , 1998, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  C. R. Watts,et al.  Significance of aromatic‐backbone amide interactions in protein structure , 2001, Proteins.

[4]  G A Petsko,et al.  Aromatic-aromatic interaction: a mechanism of protein structure stabilization. , 1985, Science.

[5]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  The interaction between phenylalanine rings in proteins , 1985 .

[6]  Annick Thomas,et al.  Pex, analytical tools for PDB files. I. GF‐Pex: Basic file to describe a protein , 2001, Proteins.

[7]  Y. Umezawa,et al.  The CH/π interaction : evidence, nature, and consequences , 1998 .

[8]  U. Samanta,et al.  Packing of aromatic rings against tryptophan residues in proteins. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[9]  U. Samanta,et al.  Environment of tryptophan side chains in proteins , 2000, Proteins.

[10]  J M Thornton,et al.  Pi-pi interactions: the geometry and energetics of phenylalanine-phenylalanine interactions in proteins. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  K. Wilson,et al.  The name is bond — H bond , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[12]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  The Cationminus signpi Interaction. , 1997, Chemical reviews.

[13]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  LINUS: A hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein , 1995, Proteins.

[14]  G. Richmond,et al.  Water at Hydrophobic Surfaces: Weak Hydrogen Bonding and Strong Orientation Effects , 2001, Science.

[15]  Z. Derewenda,et al.  The occurrence of C-H...O hydrogen bonds in proteins. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  K. Chou,et al.  Prediction of protein secondary structure content. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[17]  J. Thornton,et al.  Amino/aromatic interactions in proteins: is the evidence stacked against hydrogen bonding? , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.