Access Attitudes: A Social Learning Approach to Examining Community Engagement and Support for Press Access to Government Records

This survey-based study examines public attitudes toward press access to government records, deriving a political model predicting support for freedom of information based on social learning theory and testing whether support for press access is best explained by societal power, media importance, or political attitudes. Findings indicate that support is tied most closely to political attitudes such that the strongest predictors are community engagement and support for press rights, regardless of age, income, education, newspaper reading, or other variables. The results offer insights to help journalists, scholars, and citizens understand—and perhaps influence—public attitudes toward freedom of information.

[1]  Susan Dente Ross,et al.  In The Shadow Of Terror: The Illusive First Amendment Rights Of Aliens , 2001 .

[2]  S. Cutler,et al.  A Classic Updated@@@Tolerance for Nonconformity: A National Survey of Americans' Changing Commitment to Civil Liberties. , 1979 .

[3]  L. Curtin,et al.  Privacy in the information age? , 1999, Health management technology.

[4]  E. Austin,et al.  Individual Motivations, Perceived Media Importance, and Political Disaffection , 2001 .

[5]  Julie L. Andsager,et al.  Assessment of Outcomes of Free Expression Courses , 1998 .

[6]  L. Bobo,et al.  EDUCATION AND POLITICAL TOLERANCE TESTING THE EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE SOPHISTICATION AND TARGET GROUP AFFECT , 1989 .

[7]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  A Boost or Bust for Democracy? , 2003 .

[8]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Social Cognition: Making Sense of People , 1999 .

[9]  Michael McDevitt,et al.  What Are Journalists For , 2000 .

[10]  Courtney Kennedy,et al.  What's Missing from National Landline RDD Surveys? , 2007 .

[11]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[12]  B. Pinkleton,et al.  Media Perceptions and Public Affairs Apathy in the Politically Inexperienced , 2004 .

[13]  Public Support for the Press , 1978 .

[14]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  The Influence of Knowledge and Deference toward Scientific Authority: A Media Effects Model for Public Attitudes toward Nanotechnology , 2006 .

[15]  Jane E. Kirtley.  Transparency and Accountability in a Time of Terror: The Bush Administration's Assault on Freedom of Information , 2006 .

[16]  Bill F. Chamberlin,et al.  The Freedom of Information Act 1966–2006: A Retrospective on the Rise of Privacy Protection Over the Public Interest in Knowing What the Government's Up To , 2006 .

[17]  John Doble,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Freedom of the Press , 1982 .

[18]  M. Thompson,et al.  The Impact of Need for Cognition on Thinking About Free Speech Issues , 1995 .

[19]  Michael A. Dimock,et al.  Gauging the Impact of Growing Nonresponse on Estimates from a National RDD Telephone Survey , 2006 .

[20]  S. S. Zalkind.  Civil Liberties: An Overview of Some Contributions from the Behavioral Sciences , 1975 .

[21]  Joseph E. Phelps,et al.  Direct marketers’ use of public records: Current legal environment and outlook for the future , 2001 .

[22]  J. Lambe,et al.  Who Wants to Censor Pornography and Hate Speech? , 2004 .

[23]  Dhavan V. Shah, Nojin Kwak, R. Lance Holbert.  "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" With Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital , 2001 .

[24]  Alasdair S. Roberts,et al.  Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age , 2006 .

[25]  Dorothy A. Bowles.  Missed Opportunity: Educating Newspaper Readers about First Amendment Values , 1989 .

[26]  Larry M. Bartels.  Question Order and Declining Faith in Elections , 2002 .

[27]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[28]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation , 2000 .

[29]  Douglas M. McLeod,et al.  RESURVEYING THE BOUNDARIES OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION EFFECTS , 2002 .

[30]  Michael E. Morrell.  Survey and Experimental Evidence for a Reliable and Valid Measure of Internal Political Efficacy , 2003 .

[31]  Troy A. Murphy.  Deliberative civic education and civil society: a consideration of ideals and actualities in democracy and communication education , 2004 .

[32]  Gregg G. Van Ryzin,et al.  Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local Government , 2007 .

[33]  Hugh M. Culbertson,et al.  HOW MEDIA USE AND RELIANCE AFFECT KNOWLEDGE LEVEL , 1986 .

[34]  T. Gup.  Nation of Secrets: The Threat to Democracy and the American Way of Life , 2007 .

[35]  Robert E. Drechsel.  The First Amendment and the Media in the Court of Public Opinion , 2003 .

[36]  S. D. Ross.  An Apologia To Radical Dissent And A Supreme Court Test To Protect It , 2002 .

[37]  NAEWON KANG,et al.  A Multilevel Approach to Civic Participation , 2003, Commun. Res..

[38]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. , 2007 .

[39]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Media Use, Public Affairs Knowledge and Voting in a Local Election , 1982 .

[40]  M. Jennings,et al.  Internet Use and Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2003 .

[41]  S. Chaffee,et al.  INVOLVEMENT AND THE CONSISTENCY OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND BEHAVIORS , 1986 .

[42]  N DavisCharles.  Electronic access to information and the privacy paradox , 2003 .

[43]  Bill F. Chamberlin,et al.  Privacy Rights Versus FOIA Disclosure Policy: The "Uses and Effects" Double Standard in Access to Personally-Identifiable Information in Government Records , 2003 .

[44]  Dimensions of Civil Liberties and Personality: Relationships for Measures of Tolerance and Complexity , 1975 .

[45]  Karin Gwinn Wilkins,et al.  The Role of Media in Public Disengagement from Political Life , 2000 .

[46]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Campaign Ads, Online Messaging, and Participation: Extending the Communication Mediation Model , 2007, Journal of Communication.

[47]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  Effects of Public Opinion on Policy , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[48]  Sam Archibald,et al.  The Early Years of the Freedom of Information Act—1955 to 1974 , 1993, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[49]  Daniel N. Nelson,et al.  Public Opinion and Public Policy , 1988 .

[50]  R M Groves,et al.  Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[51]  W. Cody Wilson.  Belief in Freedom of Speech and Press , 1975 .

[52]  D. Montero.  Support for Civil Liberties among a Cohort of High School Graduates and College Students , 1975 .

[53]  R. Groves,et al.  The Role of Topic Interest in Survey Participation Decisions , 2004 .

[54]  C. Z. Nunn.  Support of Civil Liberties among College Students , 1973 .

[55]  Robert O. Wyatt.  Free expression and the American public : a survey commemorating the 200th anniversary of the First Amendment , 1991 .

[56]  Michael Pfau,et al.  The Influence of Political Talk Radio on Confidence in Democratic Institutions , 1998 .

[57]  Shirley S. Ho,et al.  Effects of Value Predispositions, Mass Media Use, and Knowledge on Public Attitudes Toward Embryonic Stem Cell Research , 2008 .

[58]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" With Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital , 2001 .

[59]  Martin E. Halstuk.  Blurred vision: How supreme court FOIA opinions on invasion of privacy have missed the target of legislative intent , 1999 .

[60]  E. Austin,et al.  Relationships of media use and political disaffection to political efficacy and voting behavior , 1998 .

[61]  E. Singer,et al.  The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[62]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement , 2007 .

[63]  E. Uslaner.  Trust, Civic Engagement, and the Internet , 2004 .

[64]  Christopher McCarty.  DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE RATES USING MOST RECENT VERSUS FINAL DISPOSITIONS IN TELEPHONE SURVEYS , 2003 .

[65]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. , 1980 .

[66]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[67]  Michael A. McGregor.  When the "Public Interest" is Not What Interests the Public , 2006 .

[68]  Julie L. Andsager,et al.  Differentiating Media Practices: How Demographic Variables Relate to Support for Freedom of the Press. , 1992 .

[69]  Shoon Murray,et al.  Variation in White House Polling Operations: Carter to Clinton , 2002 .

[70]  C. Grigg,et al.  Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement , 1960, The Journal of Politics.

[71]  C. Roser,et al.  Involvement, Attention, and Perceptions of Message Relevance in the Response to Persuasive Appeals , 1990 .

[72]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  September 11 News Coverage, Public Opinion, and Support for Civil Liberties , 2005 .

[73]  R. Groves.  Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys , 2006 .

[74]  Kiyul Uhm.  The Cold War Communication Crisis: The Right to Know Movement , 2005 .

[75]  Richard Frost,et al.  Recall and learning from broadcast news: Is print better? , 1981 .

[76]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitudes and attitude change. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[77]  Brian G. Southwell,et al.  The Effects of News and Entertainment on Interpersonal Trust: Political TalkRadio, Newspapers, and Television , 2003 .

[78]  P. Norris.  Does Television Erode Social Capital? A Reply to Putnam , 1996, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[79]  Michael F. Meffert,et al.  The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing During a Political Campaign. , 2006 .

[80]  Christopher E. Beaudoin,et al.  Social Capital in Rural and Urban Communities: Testing Differences in Media Effects and Models , 2004 .

[81]  Dennis Chong.  How People Think, Reason, and Feel about Rights and Liberties , 1993 .