Biaxial Failure of GRP—Mechanisms, Modes and Theories

Numerous failure theories have been proposed for GRP. Experimental observations under biaxial loading reveal scatter, multiple failure mechanisms and failure modes, which depend on material type and stress conditions. Biaxial failure theories can be represented as surfaces whose shape depend on both failure theory and the choice of single valued characteristic strengths. Experimental results suggest surfaces which are quadratic functions of the stresses and strengths and which often lie well inside the maximum normal stress boundaries. Failure theories which use a complex stress test to evaluate an interaction coefficient are generally unacceptable because the resulting surfaces are so sensitive to small changes in strength data. It is necessary to consider different classes of reinforcement (unidirectional, woven fabric, and random mat) separately in proposing failure theories. For unidirectional materials quadratic theories only appear to be well defined under tension-tension-shear conditions. For mats and fabrics adaptations of the early Norris theories fitted separately in each stress octant appear to be satisfactory. Failure theories only predict material failure as distinct from structural failure and should be treated with caution when applied to design.

[1]  M. Owen,et al.  Static and fatigue failure of glass fibre reinforced polyster resins under complex stress conditions , 1972 .

[2]  Charles B. Norris,et al.  Strength of orthotropic materials subjected to combined stresses. , 1962 .

[3]  J. Griffiths,et al.  Internal reinforcement joints in grp under static and fatigue loading , 1979 .

[4]  Stephen W. Tsai,et al.  A General Theory of Strength for Anisotropic Materials , 1971 .

[5]  Zvi Hashin,et al.  Fatigue Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber Composites , 1981 .

[6]  S. Tsai,et al.  Introduction to composite materials , 1980 .

[7]  Z. Hashin,et al.  Fatigue failure of angle ply laminates , 1976 .

[8]  Df Sims,et al.  Fatigue behavior of composites under different loading modes , 1977 .

[9]  A. Rotem,et al.  Fatigue Failure of Multidirectional Laminate , 1979 .

[10]  Stephen W. Tsai,et al.  Anisotropic strength of composites , 1965 .

[11]  P. Bishop,et al.  The significance of microdamage in glass-reinforced plastics at macroscopic stress concentrators , 1972 .

[12]  Z. Hashin,et al.  A Fatigue Failure Criterion for Fiber Reinforced Materials , 1973 .

[13]  H. Franklin,et al.  Classic theories of failure of anisotropic materials , 1968 .

[14]  Zvi Hashin,et al.  Failure Modes of Angle Ply Laminates , 1975 .

[15]  M. Owen,et al.  The fatigue behaviour of a glass-fabric-reinforced polyester resin under off-axis loading , 1975 .

[16]  Charles B. Norris,et al.  Compression, tension, and shear tests on yellow-poplar plywood panels of sizes that do not buckle with tests made at various angles to the face grain , 1956 .

[17]  J. R. Griffiths,et al.  Evaluation of biaxial stress failure surfaces for a glass fabric reinforced polyester resin under static and fatigue loading , 1978 .

[18]  T. Liu,et al.  On the mechanical behaviour of fibre-reinforced crystalline materials , 1961 .