BSU: A Biased Seed Unchoking Algorithm for P2P Systems

P2P architecture is one of the two predominant architectural paradigms in modern network applications, and will still be an important technology for building the content delivery applications in the future Internet. As the source of the content in P2P systems, the main objective of the seed is to help deliver the content to all peers as soon as possible and to ensure the quality of service of the peers as well as to stimulate them to contribute resources to the system. Recent researches mostly concentrate on either the unchoking algorithms of the leechers or the scheduling algorithms of the seed. In contrast, the unchoking algorithms of the seeds have drawn little attention. Experimental results have shown that the unchoking algorithm of the seeds may have a remarkable impact on the performance of the system, especially when there are a large amount of free-riders in the system. Firstly, a P2P content delivery model based on the fluid model is established in this paper. Secondly, a biased seed unchoking algorithm (BSU) is put forward. Moreover, a random seed scheduling (RSS) algorithm is proposed to further improve the efficiency of the system. Finally, a series of experiments in both homogeneous and heterogeneous environments are conducted to investigate the performance of BSU and RSS algorithm. Experimental results show that BSU and RSS algorithm can achieve better performance than existing algorithms used in BitTorrent-like systems remarkably.

[1]  Xianglin Wei,et al.  PeerMate: A malicious peer detection algorithm for P2P systems based on MSPCA , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).

[2]  Chadi Barakat,et al.  Understanding the Properties of the BitTorrent Overlay , 2007, ArXiv.

[3]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  Understanding and Improving Ratio Incentives in Private Communities , 2010, 2010 IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[4]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  The Eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks , 2003, WWW '03.

[5]  Johan A. Pouwelse,et al.  Modeling and analysis of bandwidth-inhomogeneous swarms in BitTorrent , 2009, 2009 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing.

[6]  Xianglin Wei,et al.  iRep: indirect reciprocity reputation based efficient content delivery in BT-like systems , 2013, Telecommun. Syst..

[7]  Reza Rejaie,et al.  Is content publishing in BitTorrent altruistic or profit-driven? , 2010, CoNEXT.

[8]  Venkata N. Padmanabhan,et al.  Analyzing and Improving a BitTorrent Networks Performance Mechanisms , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[9]  Ibrahim Matta,et al.  On the impact of seed scheduling in peer-to-peer networks , 2011, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Rayadurgam Srikant,et al.  Modeling and performance analysis of BitTorrent-like peer-to-peer networks , 2004, SIGCOMM 2004.

[11]  Venkata N. Padmanabhan,et al.  Analyzing and Improving BitTorrent Performance , 2005 .