Markov Chain modeling of pyelonephritis-associated pili expression in uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Pyelonephritis-associated pili (Pap) expression in uropathogenic Escherichia coli is regulated by a complex phase variation mechanism involving the competition between leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) and DNA adenine methylase (Dam). Population dynamics of pap gene expression has been studied extensively and the detailed molecular mechanism has been largely elucidated, providing sufficient information for mathematical modeling. Although the Gillespie algorithm is suited for modeling of stochastic systems such as the pap operon, it becomes computationally expensive when detailed molecular steps are explicitly modeled in a population. Here we developed a Markov Chain model to simplify the computation. Our model is analytically derived from the molecular mechanism. The model presented here is able to reproduce results presented using the Gillespie method, but since the regulatory information is incorporated before simulation, our model runs more efficiently and allows investigation of additional regulatory features. The model predictions are consistent with experimental data obtained in this work and in the literature. The results show that pap expression in uropathogenic E. coli is initial-state-dependent, as previously reported. However, without environment stimuli, the pap-expressing fraction in a population will reach an equilibrium level after approximately 50-100 generations. The transient time before reaching equilibrium is determined by PapI stability and Lrp and Dam copy numbers per cell. This work demonstrates that the Markov Chain model captures the essence of the complex molecular mechanism and greatly simplifies the computation.

[1]  M. Marinus,et al.  Novel growth rate control of dam gene expression in Escherichia coli , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  David A Low,et al.  The mechanism by which DNA adenine methylase and PapI activate the pap epigenetic switch. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[3]  D. Low,et al.  Self-perpetuating epigenetic pili switches in bacteria , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  L. Blyn,et al.  Phase‐variation of pyelonephritis‐associated pili in Escherichia coli: evidence for transcriptional regulation. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[5]  J. Calvo,et al.  Effects of nutrition and growth rate on Lrp levels in Escherichia coli , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  M. W. van der Woude,et al.  Epigenetic phase variation of the pap operon in Escherichia coli. , 1996, Trends in microbiology.

[7]  L. Kaltenbach,et al.  Differential binding of Lrp to two sets of pap DNA binding sites mediated by Pap I regulates Pap phase variation in Escherichia coli. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[8]  E. Boye,et al.  Quantitation of Dam methyltransferase in Escherichia coli , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  M. W. Woude,et al.  Evidence for global regulatory control of pilus expression in Escherichia coli by Lrp and DNA methylation: model building based on analysis of pap , 1992, Molecular microbiology.

[10]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[11]  L. Kaltenbach,et al.  Methylation patterns in pap regulatory DNA control pyelonephritis-associated pili phase variation in E. coli , 1994, Cell.

[12]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  Fifteen minutes of fim: control of type 1 pili expression in E. coli. , 2002, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[13]  James C Liao,et al.  Stochastic modeling of the phase‐variable pap operon regulation in uropathogenic Escherichia coli , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  Michael A. Gibson,et al.  Efficient Exact Stochastic Simulation of Chemical Systems with Many Species and Many Channels , 2000 .

[15]  A. Kierzek,et al.  Bridging the gap between stochastic and deterministic regimes in the kinetic simulations of the biochemical reaction networks. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[16]  L. Kaltenbach,et al.  Leucine‐responsive regulatory protein plays dual roles as both an activator and a repressor of the Escherichia coli pap fimbrial operon , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[17]  E. Newman,et al.  Metabolic regulation of Irp gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12 , 1997 .

[18]  D. Low,et al.  The intricate workings of a bacterial epigenetic switch. , 2004, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[19]  D. Gillespie Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems , 2001 .

[20]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[21]  Xiangwu Nou,et al.  Regulation of pyelonephritis‐associated pili phase‐variation in Escherichia coli: binding of the Papl and the Lrp regulatory proteins is controlled by DNA methylation , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[22]  S. Chen,et al.  Modulation of Lrp action in Escherichia coli by leucine: effects on non-specific binding of Lrp to DNA. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  I. Henderson,et al.  Molecular switches — the ON and OFF of bacterial phase variation , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[24]  L. Rasmussen,et al.  Growth-rate-dependent transcription initiation from the dam P2 promoter. , 1995, Gene.

[25]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Villapakkam,et al.  H-NS Controls pap and daaFimbrial Transcription in Escherichia coli in Response to Multiple Environmental Cues , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.