Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit

BackgroundWe previously developed a comprehensive proficiency-based robotic training curriculum demonstrating construct, content, and face validity. This study aimed to assess reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit associated with curricular implementation.MethodsOver an 11-month period, 55 residents, fellows, and faculty (robotic novices) from general surgery, urology, and gynecology were enrolled in a 2-month curriculum: online didactics, half-day hands-on tutorial, and self-practice using nine inanimate exercises. Each trainee completed a questionnaire and performed a single proctored repetition of each task before (pretest) and after (post-test) training. Tasks were scored for time and errors using modified FLS metrics. For inter-rater reliability (IRR), three trainees were scored by two raters and analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Data from eight experts were analyzed using ICC and Cronbach’s α to determine test-retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively. Educational benefit was assessed by comparing baseline (pretest) and final (post-test) trainee performance; comparisons used Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsOf the 55 trainees that pretested, 53 (96 %) completed all curricular components in 9–17 h and reached proficiency after completing an average of 72 ± 28 repetitions over 5 ± 1 h. Trainees indicated minimal prior robotic experience and “poor comfort” with robotic skills at baseline (1.8 ± 0.9) compared to final testing (3.1 ± 0.8, p < 0.001). IRR data for the composite score revealed an ICC of 0.96 (p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was 0.91 (p < 0.001) and internal consistency was 0.81. Performance improved significantly after training for all nine tasks and according to composite scores (548 ± 176 vs. 914 ± 81, p < 0.001), demonstrating educational benefit.ConclusionThis curriculum is associated with high reliability measures, demonstrated feasibility for a large cohort of trainees, and yielded significant educational benefit. Further studies and adoption of this curriculum are encouraged.

[1]  Khadija Iqbal,et al.  An introduction , 1996, Neurobiology of Aging.

[2]  V. Patel,et al.  Evolution of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy , 2009, Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society.

[3]  A. Goh,et al.  Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Nabeel A. Arain,et al.  Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. , 2012, Surgery.

[5]  Gerald M. Fried,et al.  Objective Assessment of Technical Performance , 2008, World Journal of Surgery.

[6]  Nabeel A. Arain,et al.  Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  David I. Lee,et al.  Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[8]  G. Dulan,et al.  Content and face validity of a comprehensive robotic skills training program for general surgery, urology, and gynecology. , 2012, American journal of surgery.

[9]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Educational Research: An Introduction , 1965 .

[10]  G. Fried,et al.  Proving the Value of Simulation in Laparoscopic Surgery , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[11]  Lori Weinberg,et al.  Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: An Updated Systematic Review , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology international.

[12]  R. M. Satava,et al.  Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[13]  G. Fried,et al.  The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoscopic surgery , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[14]  Elspeth M McDougall,et al.  Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. , 2011, The Journal of urology.