Forewarning interruptions in dynamic settings: Can prevention bolster recovery?

In complex dynamic work environments, the consequences of task interruptions on performance can put public safety at risk. If not designed carefully, current tools aiming to facilitate interruption recovery can instead hamper performance because of information overload. Although a simpler solution-the forewarning of an imminent interruption-has proven effective in static contexts, existing theories of task interruption do not clearly predict its impact on the resumption of dynamically evolving tasks. The current study examined the effects of a preinterruption warning in dynamic settings to develop a better understanding of task resumption and supplement current theoretical accounts. In a simulation of above-water warfare, scenarios were either uninterrupted, unexpectedly interrupted, or interrupted following an auditory warning. Behavioral, oculomotor, and pupillometric data regarding decision making, information processing, and cognitive load were computed before, during, and after each interruption (or the corresponding moment). Interruption warnings triggered a cognitively demanding preinterruption preparation that, in turn, speeded up postinterruption information processing and decision making and lowered cognitive load when resuming the interrupted task. These findings help to complement current theories of interruptions while showing that preinterruption warnings represent a promising way to support interruption recovery in complex dynamic situations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  Daniel C. McFarlane,et al.  Comparison of Four Primary Methods for Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Sheryl L. Miller Window of Opportunity: Using the Interruption Lag to Manage Disruption in Complex Tasks , 2002 .

[3]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: Data and a model , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  F. Vachon,et al.  Eyes have ears: Indexing the orienting response to sound using pupillometry. , 2018, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[5]  William J Horrey,et al.  The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. , 2006 .

[7]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interruption of the Tower of London task: support for a goal-activation approach. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Dario D. Salvucci On reconstruction of task context after interruption , 2010, CHI.

[9]  S. Furukawa,et al.  Human Pupillary Dilation Response to Deviant Auditory Stimuli: Effects of Stimulus Properties and Voluntary Attention , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[10]  F. Vachon,et al.  Is auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds underpinned by the same mechanism? Evidence from pupillometry , 2019, Biological Psychology.

[11]  Harvey S. Smallman,et al.  Staying Up to Speed: Four Design Principles for Maintaining and Recovering Situation Awareness , 2008 .

[12]  M. Just,et al.  Eye fixations and cognitive processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Andrew L. Cohen,et al.  The effect of interruption on the decision-making process , 2016, Judgment and Decision Making.

[14]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  Effects of a Warning on Interruption Recovery in Dynamic Settings , 2016 .

[16]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Task Interruption: Resumption Lag and the Role of Cues , 2004 .

[17]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Raj M. Ratwani,et al.  Recovering from Interruptions: Does Alert Type Matter? , 2009 .

[19]  J. Trafton,et al.  The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[20]  Raj M. Ratwani,et al.  A memory for goals model of sequence errors , 2011, Cognitive Systems Research.

[21]  Stacey D. Scott,et al.  Assisting Interruption Recovery in Supervisory Control of Multiple Uavs , 2006 .

[22]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Situation Awareness Recovery , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Walter R. Boot,et al.  Detecting Transient Changes in Dynamic Displays: The More You Look, the Less You See , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[25]  Jean-Paul Imbert,et al.  Attentional costs and failures in air traffic control notifications , 2014, Ergonomics.

[26]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  Mitigating disruptive effects of interruptions through training: what needs to be practiced? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[27]  B. McGuinness,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Situational Awareness (QUASA): Applying Signal Detection Theory to True/False Probes and Self-Ratings , 2004 .

[28]  Raj M. Ratwani,et al.  Spatial memory guides task resumption , 2008 .

[29]  Deborah A. Boehm-Davis,et al.  Do Interruptions Affect Quality of Work? , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[30]  G. Michael,et al.  Failures Due to Interruptions or Distractions: A Review and a New Framework. , 2017, The American journal of psychology.

[31]  P. Morgan,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of an interruption lag by inducing a memory-based strategy. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[32]  A. Smith,et al.  Distraction and interruption in anaesthetic practice. , 2012, British journal of anaesthesia.

[33]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  The Benefits and the Costs of Using Auditory Warning Messages in Dynamic Decision-Making Settings , 2018 .

[34]  Harvey S. Smallman,et al.  Recovery from Interruptions to a Dynamic Monitoring Task: The Beguiling Utility of Instant Replay , 2005 .

[35]  J. Swets,et al.  A decision-making theory of visual detection. , 1954, Psychological review.

[36]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Daniel Lafond,et al.  Assessing temporal support for dynamic decision making in C2 , 2007 .

[38]  Mickaël Causse,et al.  Failure to Detect Critical Auditory Alerts in the Cockpit , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[39]  F. Vachon,et al.  Can pupillometry index auditory attentional capture in contexts of active visual processing? , 2018 .

[40]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs , 1999 .

[43]  Daniel Lafond,et al.  Supporting situation awareness: A tradeoff between benefits and overhead , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).

[44]  Sebastiaan Mathôt,et al.  Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[45]  David Z Hambrick,et al.  Effects of Interruption Length on Procedural Errors , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[46]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  Background Sound Impairs Interruption Recovery in Dynamic Task Situations: Procedural Conflict? , 2014 .

[47]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[48]  Jelmer P Borst,et al.  Avoiding the problem state bottleneck by strategic use of the environment. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[49]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[50]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Dynamic Decision Theory and Probabilistic Information Processings1 , 1962 .

[51]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[52]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Remembering to Execute Deferred Tasks in Simulated Air Traffic Control: The Impact of Interruptions , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[53]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[54]  Nash Unsworth,et al.  Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[55]  Dylan Marc Jones,et al.  Interruptions in the Tower of London Task: Can Preparation Minimise Disruption? , 2003 .

[56]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management , 2008, TCHI.

[57]  Stacey D. Scott,et al.  Supervisory-level interruption recovery in time-critical control tasks. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[58]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  Supporting dynamic change detection: using the right tool for the task , 2016, Cognitive research: principles and implications.

[59]  Stacey D. Scott,et al.  Interruption Management and Recovery in Time-critical Supervisory-level Tasks , 2013 .

[60]  N. Taatgen,et al.  What happens when we switch tasks: pupil dilation in multitasking. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[61]  W. Hays Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[62]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  Decision support and vulnerability to interruption in a dynamic multitasking environment , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[63]  Roger E. Kirk,et al.  Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). , 1995 .

[64]  Thom Baguley,et al.  Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[65]  Steven Shorrock,et al.  Errors of memory in air traffic control. , 2005 .

[66]  F. Vachon,et al.  Attentional Capture by Deviant Sounds: A Noncontingent Form of Auditory Distraction? , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[67]  Shayne Loft,et al.  The Chronic Detrimental Impact of Interruptions in a Simulated Submarine Track Management Task , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[68]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: the role of associative activation. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  Scott R Walter,et al.  Task errors by emergency physicians are associated with interruptions, multitasking, fatigue and working memory capacity: a prospective, direct observation study , 2018, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[70]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[71]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Nonexplicit Change Detection in Complex Dynamic Settings , 2012, Hum. Factors.