Sunnybrook facial grading system: Reliability and criteria for grading

In clinical research, which is distinctly quantitative and rigidly fixed to a written protocol, the need for precision is great, especially when multicenter trials are planned. The Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SB) is a well‐established tool for assessing facial movement outcomes; however, some ambiguities do arise. The purpose of this study was to construct specific grading criteria and to test the intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability before and after the use of these criteria. The hypothesis was that even in naïve observers, specific criteria improve reliability.

[1]  T. Poussa,et al.  Sunnybrook and House-Brackmann Facial Grading Systems: Intrarater repeatability and interrater agreement , 2006, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[2]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Toronto Facial Grading System: Interobserver reliability , 2000, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[3]  N. Surgery [Facial nerve grading system]. , 2006, Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery.

[4]  J. W. House,et al.  Facial nerve grading systems. , 1983, The Laryngoscope.

[5]  Sunnybrook and House‐Brackmann Facial Grading Systems: Intrarater repeatability and interrater agreement , 2007 .

[6]  J. Nedzelski,et al.  Reliability of the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System by novice users. , 2001, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[7]  E. Dooley National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke , 2006 .

[8]  J. Nedzelski,et al.  Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. , 1996, European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.