Illusion of Control in Internet Users and College Students

When people try to obtain a desired event and this outcome occurs independently of their behavior, they often think that they are controlling its occurrence. This is known as the illusion of control, and it is the basis for most superstitions and pseudosciences. However, most experiments demonstrating this effect had been conducted many years ago and almost always in the controlled environment of the psychology laboratory and with psychology students as subjects. Here, we explore the generality of this effect and show that it is still today a robust phenomenon that can be observed even in the context of a very simple computer program that users try to control (and believe that they are controlling) over the Internet. Understanding how robust and general this effect is, is a first step towards eradicating irrational and pseudoscientific thinking.

[1]  H. Matute.  Human Reactions to Uncontrollable Outcomes: Further Evidence for Superstitions Rather than Helplessness , 1995 .

[2]  E. Wasserman.  Detecting Response-Outcome Relations: Toward an Understanding of the Causal Texture of the Environment , 1990 .

[3]  Helena Matute,et al.  Web-based experiment control software for research and teaching on human learning , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[4]  R. Msetfi,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Depressive Realism and the Effect of Intertrial Interval on Judgements of Zero, Positive, and Negative Contingencies , 2022 .

[5]  Jennifer Crocker,et al.  Judgment of Covariation by Social Perceivers , 1981 .

[6]  H. Matute.  Illusion of Control: Detecting Response-Outcome Independence in Analytic but Not in Naturalistic Conditions , 1996 .

[7]  Ellen A. Skinner,et al.  Action, control judgments, and the structure of control experience. , 1985 .

[8]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Associative Accounts of Causality Judgment , 1988 .

[9]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[10]  The sad truth about depressive realism , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Helena Matute,et al.  Learned Helplessness and Superstitious Behavior as Opposite Effects of Uncontrollable Reinforcement in Humans , 1994 .

[12]  C. Clements,et al.  Illusion of control: invulnerability to negative affect and depressive symptoms after laboratory and natural stressors. , 1992, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  L. Abramson,et al.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser? , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. , 1972 .

[15]  Christopher C. Rosen,et al.  The effect of non-contingent negative and positive reinforcement operations on the acquisition of superstitious behaviors , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[16]  Miguel A. Vadillo,et al.  The internet as a research tool in the study of associative learning: An example from overshadowing , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[17]  L. Allan.  A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks , 1980 .

[18]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .