The flatness of Siemens linear accelerator x-ray fields.

The primary definer for Siemens MXE and MDX linear accelerators projects a circular opening with a radius of 25 cm at 100 cm from the target. Our measurements of photon beam profiles, however, indicate that the photon fluence drops to 95% of the central axis value at a radius of 18 cm. The flattening filter for these machines projects a flattened field size that is much smaller than the primary definer would allow. The clinical implications of this mismatch for large rectangular fields and for fields defined by asymmetric jaws are discussed and solutions are considered. A large field flattener was designed for our Siemens MXE 6 MV beam using Monte Carlo simulation of the treatment head and water phantom. The accuracy required of source and geometry details for dose distributions calculation is presented. The key parameters are the mean energy and focal spot size of the electron beam incident on the exit window, the material composition, and thickness profile of the exit window, target, flattener, and primary collimator, and the position of the primary collimator relative to the target. Profiles were more sensitive than central axis depth doses to simulation details. The beam energy and primary collimator position were selected to achieve good agreement between measured and calculated dose distributions. The flattener we designed with Monte Carlo was machined from brass and mounted on our MXE treatment unit. Measurements demonstrate that the large field flattener extends the useful radius of the field out to 22 cm, right into the penumbra cast by the primary collimator.

[1]  David W. O. Rogers,et al.  Comparisons of thick-target bremsstrahlung calculations by EGS4/PRESTA and ITS version 2.1 , 1993 .

[2]  K. Van Laere,et al.  Design of field flattening filters for a high-power bremsstrahlung converter by full Monte Carlo simulation , 1997 .

[3]  A Ahnesjö,et al.  Collimator scatter in photon therapy beams. , 1995, Medical physics.

[4]  A Fenster,et al.  X-ray scatter in megavoltage transmission radiography: physical characteristics and influence on image quality. , 1994, Medical physics.

[5]  David W. O. Rogers,et al.  Presta: The parameter reduced electron-step transport algorithm for electron monte carlo transport , 1986 .

[6]  C. Ma,et al.  BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. , 1995, Medical physics.

[7]  B A Faddegon,et al.  Calculation of x-ray spectra for radiosurgical beams. , 1995, Medical physics.

[8]  B A Faddegon,et al.  Angular distribution of bremsstrahlung from 15-MeV electrons incident on thick targets of Be, Al, and Pb. , 1991, Medical physics.

[9]  P C Lee,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of the differential beam hardening effect of a flattening filter on a therapeutic x-ray beam. , 1997, Medical physics.

[10]  A Fenster,et al.  X-ray sources of medical linear accelerators: focal and extra-focal radiation. , 1993, Medical physics.

[11]  E L Chaney,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of accelerator head scatter. , 1994, Medical physics.

[12]  B A Faddegon,et al.  Forward-directed bremsstrahlung of 10- to 30-MeV electrons incident on thick targets of Al and Pb. , 1990, Medical physics.

[13]  P J Biggs,et al.  AAPM code of practice for radiotherapy accelerators: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Task Group No. 45. , 1994, Medical physics.