QSM Reconstruction Challenge 2.0: Design and Report of Results

Purpose The aim of the second quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reconstruction challenge (Oct 2019, Seoul, Korea) was to test the accuracy of QSM dipole inversion algorithms in simulated brain data. Methods A two-stage design was chosen for this challenge. The participants were provided with datasets of multi-echo gradient echo images synthesized from two realistic in silico head phantoms using an MR simulator. At the first stage, participants optimized QSM reconstructions without ground-truths available to mimic the clinical setting. At the second stage, ground-truths were provided for parameter optimization.Submissions were evaluated using eight numerical metrics and visual ratings. Results A total of 98 reconstructions were submitted for stage 1 and 47 submissions for stage 2. Iterative methods had the best quantitative metric scores, followed by deep-learning and direct inversion methods. Priors derived from magnitude data improved the metric scores. Algorithms based on iterative approaches and Total Variation (and its derivatives) produced the best overall results. The reported results and analysis pipelines have been made public to allow researchers to compare new methods to the current state of the art. Conclusion The synthetic data provides a consistent framework to test the accuracy and robustness of QSM algorithms in the presence of noise, calcifications and minor voxel dephasing effects. Total Variation-based algorithmsproduced the best results along all metrics. Future QSM challenges should asses if this good performance with synthetic datasets translates to more realistic scenarios, where background fields and dipole-incompatible phase contributions are included.

[1]  Yi Wang,et al.  Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Kawin Setsompop,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet , 2018, NeuroImage.

[3]  José P. Marques,et al.  QSM reconstruction challenge 2.0: A realistic in silico head phantom for MRI data simulation and evaluation of susceptibility mapping procedures , 2021, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Yi Wang,et al.  Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): A method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Functional quantitative susceptibility mapping (fQSM) , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[7]  J Tang,et al.  Improving susceptibility mapping using a threshold‐based K‐space/image domain iterative reconstruction approach , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Steffen Bollmann,et al.  Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep learning: Current status, challenges and opportunities , 2019, NMR in biomedicine.

[9]  Kawin Setsompop,et al.  Nonlinear dipole inversion (NDI) enables robust quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) , 2020, NMR in biomedicine.

[10]  Wei Li,et al.  Susceptibility‐weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  K. Shmueli,et al.  An optimized and highly repeatable MRI acquisition and processing pipeline for quantitative susceptibility mapping in the head‐and‐neck region , 2020, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Bibek Dhital,et al.  Gibbs‐ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel‐shifts , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Pascal Spincemaille,et al.  Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Himanshu Bhat,et al.  Quantitative oxygenation venography from MRI phase , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Julio Acosta-Cabronero,et al.  Weak‐harmonic regularization for quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Rolf Gruetter,et al.  A modulated closed form solution for quantitative susceptibility mapping — A thorough evaluation and comparison to iterative methods based on edge prior knowledge , 2015, NeuroImage.

[17]  Kawin Setsompop,et al.  Fast image reconstruction with L2‐regularization , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  Shun Zhang,et al.  Fidelity imposed network edit (FINE) for solving ill-posed image reconstruction , 2019, NeuroImage.

[19]  Chunlei Liu Susceptibility tensor imaging , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Juan Liu,et al.  Non-locally Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Network for Whole Brain QSM Inversion , 2019, ArXiv.

[21]  C. Tejos,et al.  Fast nonlinear susceptibility inversion with variational regularization , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction using annihilating filter‐based low‐rank Hankel matrix approach , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Julio Acosta-Cabronero,et al.  In Vivo MRI Mapping of Brain Iron Deposition across the Adult Lifespan , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Christian Langkammer,et al.  DeepQSM - using deep learning to solve the dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2019, NeuroImage.

[25]  Klaas Paul Pruessmann,et al.  Probing neuronal activation by functional quantitative susceptibility mapping under a visual paradigm: A group level comparison with BOLD fMRI and PET , 2016, NeuroImage.

[26]  Hongjiang Wei,et al.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Contrast Mechanisms and Clinical Applications , 2015, Tomography.

[27]  Jae Myung Kim,et al.  Exploring linearity of deep neural network trained QSM: QSMnet+ , 2019, NeuroImage.

[28]  E. Haacke,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions. , 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Toward online reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility maps: Superfast dipole inversion , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  José P. Marques,et al.  An illustrated comparison of processing methods for MR phase imaging and QSM: combining array coil signals and phase unwrapping , 2016, NMR in biomedicine.

[31]  Polina Golland,et al.  Probabilistic Modeling of Imaging, Genetics and Diagnosis , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Differentiates between Blood Depositions and Calcifications in Patients with Glioblastoma , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  S. Lehéricy,et al.  Reproducibility of R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reconstruction methods in the basal ganglia of healthy subjects , 2017, NMR in biomedicine.

[34]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  Christopher P. Hess,et al.  QSMGAN: Improved Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping using 3D Generative Adversarial Networks with increased receptive field , 2019, NeuroImage.

[36]  Christian Kames,et al.  Rapid two-step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors , 2018, NeuroImage.

[37]  Oliver Speck,et al.  A robust multi-scale approach to quantitative susceptibility mapping , 2018, NeuroImage.

[38]  Tian Liu,et al.  Intracranial calcifications and hemorrhages: characterization with quantitative susceptibility mapping. , 2013, Radiology.

[39]  Li Guo,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping: Report from the 2016 reconstruction challenge , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  Kristian Bredies,et al.  Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping using 3D EPI and total generalized variation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[41]  Jin Keun Seo,et al.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  J. Duyn,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[43]  Yang Gao,et al.  xQSM: quantitative susceptibility mapping with octave convolutional and noise-regularized neural networks. , 2020, NMR in biomedicine.

[44]  Zhong Chen,et al.  Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using Structural Feature Based Collaborative Reconstruction (SFCR) in the Human Brain , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[45]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain , 2012, NeuroImage.

[46]  Julio Acosta-Cabronero,et al.  The 2016 QSM Challenge: Lessons learned and considerations for a future challenge design , 2020, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[47]  Jianrong Xu,et al.  Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range , 2015, NMR in biomedicine.