Hepatitis C Treatment Among People Who Use Drugs in an Office-Based Opioid Treatment Program Versus a Syringe Exchange Program: A Real-World Prospective Clinical Trial

Background: Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) treatment in people who inject drugs (PWID) is a key component of elimination models but PWID face substantial barriers to treatment access. Despite data showing treatment outcomes among PWID on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are similar to non-PWID outcomes, few studies examine PWID treatment outcomes with only syringe services support. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of recruitment for HCV treatment with elbasvir/grazoprevir (E/G) in a syringe services program (SSP) as compared to an MOUD program for people with opioid use disorder. Methods: This real-world, multi-site prospective open-label pilot study compares treatment of PWID with aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio (APRI) < 0.7 and genotype 1a, 1b, and 4 HCV with E/G, engaged in MOUD (n = 25) or an SSP (n = 25). The MOUD arm was enrolled through a federally qualified community health center and SSP arm through a nearby SSP. Prospective arms were compared to an academic hepatology clinic group (n = 50). Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12), medication adherence, and treatment discontinuation were evaluated. Results: In the MOUD vs SSP arms, substance use throughout treatment was found in 36% (9/25) vs 100% (25/25); good adherence (> 90% pills taken) in 100% (25/25) vs 68% (17/25); treatment completion 100% (25/25) vs 64% (16/25); and SVR12 rates were 96% (24/25) vs 60% (15/25). In the community standard comparison group, SVR12 was achieved in 94% (47/50). There were two virologic failures or re-infections in the SSP group; all other non-responders were due to missing SVR12 data. Conclusions: While recruitment and follow-up are challenging in SSPs, preliminary data suggests adherence, treatment completion, and SVR12 are high in PWID treated with E/G engaging in SSP or MOUD. All metrics are comparable to community standards for non-PWID for treatment of HCV with direct-antiviral drugs.

[1]  P. Korthuis,et al.  A hepatitis C elimination model in healthcare for the homeless organization: A novel reflexive laboratory algorithm and equity assessment. , 2021, The International journal on drug policy.

[2]  T. Vindenes,et al.  1065. Hepatitis C Virus Care Cascade Assessment–One Step Closer to Micro-Elimination , 2020 .

[3]  C. Gilks,et al.  Hepatitis C cascade of care at an integrated community facility for people who inject drugs. , 2020, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[4]  J. O’Beirne,et al.  Performance of simple serum‐based tests to exclude cirrhosis prior to hepatitis C treatment in non‐hospital settings in Australia , 2020, Internal medicine journal.

[5]  B. Reilley,et al.  Hepatitis C drug prescriptions and Medicaid policies--four states, Indian health care system, USA 2018 , 2019, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[6]  J. Lambert,et al.  HepCare Europe: a service innovation project. HepCheck: enhancing HCV identification and linkage to care for vulnerable populations through intensified outreach screening. A prospective multisite feasibility study , 2019, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[7]  P. Read,et al.  Treatment adherence and support for people who inject drugs taking direct‐acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C infection , 2019, Journal of viral hepatitis.

[8]  A. Zaman,et al.  Life projects: the transformative potential of direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C among people who inject drugs. , 2019, The International journal on drug policy.

[9]  M. Hellard,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of an integrated nurse model of care providing hepatitis C treatment to people attending homeless services in Melbourne, Australia. , 2019, The International journal on drug policy.

[10]  T. Baggett,et al.  Hepatitis C treatment outcomes among homeless-experienced individuals at a community health centre in Boston. , 2019, The International journal on drug policy.

[11]  J. Leung,et al.  Global, regional, and country‐level estimates of hepatitis C infection among people who have recently injected drugs , 2018, Addiction.

[12]  G. Dore,et al.  Direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C among people who use or inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2018, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[13]  J. Roy,et al.  Absolute Insurer Denial of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C: A National Specialty Pharmacy Cohort Study , 2018, Open forum infectious diseases.

[14]  P. Read,et al.  Sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for hepatitis C virus infection in people with recent injection drug use (SIMPLIFY): an open-label, single-arm, phase 4, multicentre trial. , 2018, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[15]  J. Leung,et al.  Global prevalence of injecting drug use and sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of HIV, HBV, and HCV in people who inject drugs: a multistage systematic review , 2017, The Lancet. Global health.

[16]  M. Tumber Restricted Access: State Medicaid Coverage of Sofosbuvir Hepatitis C Treatment , 2017, The Journal of legal medicine.

[17]  Roger Chou,et al.  Blood Tests to Diagnose Fibrosis or Cirrhosis in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  R. Soloway,et al.  APRI: An Easy and Validated Predictor of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C , 2006, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.