Instructional manipulations and age differences in memory: now you see them, now you don't.

The instructions for most explicit memory tests use language that emphasizes the memorial component of the task. This language may put older adults at a disadvantage relative to younger adults because older adults believe that their memories have deteriorated. Consequently, typical explicit memory tests may overestimate age-related decline in cognitive performance. In 2 experiments, older and younger adults performed a memory test on newly learned trivia. In both experiments, age differences were obtained when the instructions emphasized the memory component of the task (memory emphasis) but not when the instructions did not emphasize memory (memory neutral). These findings suggest that aspects of the testing situation. such as experimental instructions, may exaggerate age differences in memory performance and need to be considered when designing studies investigating age differences in memory.

[1]  Leah L. Light,et al.  Memory and Aging , 1996 .

[2]  Peter Graf,et al.  Implicit Memory : New Directions in Cognition, Development, and Neuropsychology , 1993 .

[3]  D A Fleischman,et al.  Repetition priming in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease: a review of findings and theories. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[4]  Michael D. Kopelman,et al.  The handbook of memory disorders , 1995 .

[5]  S. See,et al.  Age-based beliefs about memory changes for self and others across adulthood. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[6]  Renée L. Babcock,et al.  An examination of the factor structure of four of the cognitive abilities included in the educational testing service kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1997 .

[7]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .

[8]  D. Kausler Experimental psychology, cognition, and human aging , 1982 .

[9]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[10]  R. West,et al.  Age Declines in Memory Self-Efficacy: General or Limited to Particular Tasks and Measure? , 1994 .

[11]  J. Berry Memory Self-Efficacy in Its Social Cognitive Context , 1999 .

[12]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Aging and dual-task performance. , 1996 .

[13]  Sandra E. Trehub,et al.  Aging and cognitive processes , 1982 .

[14]  Mark Byrd,et al.  Patterns of memory loss in three elderly samples. , 1987, Psychology and aging.

[15]  Christy L. McGuire,et al.  Beliefs about Memory and Aging , 1999 .

[16]  Margie E. Lachman,et al.  Assessing memory control beliefs: The memory controllability inventory , 1995 .

[17]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[18]  F. Blanchard-Fields,et al.  Perspectives On Cognitive Change In Adulthood and Aging , 1996 .

[19]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[20]  L L Light,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory in young and older adults. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  M. J. Intons-Peterson,et al.  Aging, optimal testing times, and negative priming. , 1998 .

[22]  E. Ryan Beliefs about memory changes across the adult life span. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[23]  David B. Mitchell,et al.  Semantic activation and episodic memory: age similarities and differences , 1986 .

[24]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Optimal Time of Day and the Magnitude of Age Differences in Memory , 1993 .

[25]  David B. Mitchell,et al.  The Appearance and Disappearance of Age Differences in Adult Memory , 1982 .

[26]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  B. T. Johnson,et al.  Attitudes toward older and younger adults: a meta-analysis. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[28]  E. E. Green,et al.  7 I Believe, Therefore I Can: Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Memory Aging , 1990 .

[29]  F. Blanchard-Fields Social Cognition and Aging , 2001 .

[30]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[31]  F. Craik,et al.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[32]  C. Steele A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[33]  L Hasher,et al.  Synchrony effects in inhibitory control over thought and action. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  D. Gilbert How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[35]  R. Keefover,et al.  Aging and cognition. , 1998, Neurologic clinics.

[36]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[37]  Helena Chmura Kraemer,et al.  How Many Subjects? Statistical Power Analysis in Research , 1987 .

[38]  C. Stangor,et al.  Prejudice : the target's perspective , 1999 .

[39]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. , 1998 .

[40]  Frederick T. Bacon Credibility of Repeated Statements: Memory for Trivia. , 1979 .

[41]  C. Yoon Age Differences in Consumers' Processing Strategies: An Investigation of Moderating Influences , 1997 .

[42]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[43]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Handbook of the Psychology of Aging , 1979 .

[44]  M. Lachman,et al.  The Sense of Control and Cognitive Aging: Toward a Model of Mediational Processes , 1999 .

[45]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[46]  Patrick S. Malone,et al.  Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information , 1990 .

[47]  Eugene A. Lovelace,et al.  Aging and cognition : mental processes, self-awareness, and interventions , 1990 .