An Effective Framework for Enhancing Student Engagement and Performance in Final Year Projects

Over the years, there have been many factors that have influenced the landscape of higher education within the UK. These factors include the rise in tuition fees, the introduction of the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) and the formation of Office for Students. Although student performance plays a vital part, another significantly influential key performance indicator that impacts these factors is student experience, which is influenced by positive or negative feedback and engagement. Despite student engagement forming a key part of the learning environment, it is still perceived as one of the weakest aspects when it comes to enhancing the student experience. In this paper, we present the implementation of an innovative, holistic teaching & learning framework for the final year project module trialed within the Department of Engineering and Computing at the University of East London. This project module had been running in different forms since the inception of the undergraduate programmes within the department, however it generally yielded poor and inconsistent evaluation, student experience and engagement. The framework was introduced during the academic year 2015/16, where its evaluation has shown a positive impact on student engagement, performance and experience, compared to the previous year.

[1]  K. Ann Renninger,et al.  Studying Triggers for Interest and Engagement Using Observational Methods , 2015 .

[2]  Syila Izawana Ismail,et al.  Online Project Evaluation and Supervision System (oPENs) for final year project proposal development process , 2017, 2017 IEEE 15th Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD).

[3]  S. Brookfield Becoming a critically reflective teacher , 1995 .

[4]  Putri FaizuraMegat Khamaruddin,et al.  Using moodle as an integrated final year project management system , 2017, 2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED).

[5]  Ian McGill,et al.  Action learning : a guide for professional, management, and educational development , 1995 .

[6]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[7]  Peter Maurer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , 2022 .

[8]  Justus J. Randolph,et al.  Teachers' engagement and students' satisfaction with a playful learning environment , 2017 .

[9]  Roger Säljö,et al.  Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[10]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Christina Hughes,et al.  Chapter 10 The Teaching Excellence Framework: Quality, Equality and Student Engagement in English Higher Education , 2018, Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning.

[12]  Andrew J. Martin The Student Motivation Scale: A Tool for Measuring and Enhancing Motivation , 2001, Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools.

[13]  Pirkko Siklander,et al.  Exploring triggers for arousing interest in the online learning , 2017 .

[14]  C. Bryson,et al.  The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning , 2007 .

[15]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[16]  Terence Hogarth,et al.  Methodological issues in estimating the value added of further education, higher education and skills: a review of relevant literature , 2014 .

[17]  Harvey Singh,et al.  Building Effective Blended Learning Programs , 2021, Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-Learning Frameworks.

[18]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Vicki Trowler Student engagement literature review , 2010 .

[20]  N. Rose The Cambridge Handbook of The Learning Sciences , 2007, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[21]  Ángel Uruburu Colsa,et al.  Final year project: students and instructors perceptions as a competence-strengthening tool for engineering students , 2012 .

[22]  Arina Sauki,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model Analysis on Students' Behavioral Intention of Using Moodle for FYP , 2017, 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF).