The Relationship between National Culture and the Usability of an E-learning System

The purpose of this study was to investigate possible relationships between national culture and the usability of an e-learning system. The theoretical frameworks that were used to guide this study were Hofstede's cultural dimensions and Nielsen's usability attributes. The sample for this study was composed of the twenty-four attendees in an international workshop on training improvement held in Penang, Malaysia. This population was selected for this study because of the attendees' diverse cultural backgrounds and their underlying interest in all forms of training and instructional delivery. Three instruments were used in this study and each instrument assisted in collecting information regarding unique aspects of the research study. The study revealed that high uncertainty avoidance cultures found the e-learning system most frustrating to use. The study also found that individuals from cultures with low power distance indicators (e.g. people who are more accepting of uneven power distribution) rated the overall usability higher than individuals from high power distance indicator cultures.

[1]  Betty Collis,et al.  Adaptation of courses for trans-European tele-learning , 1995 .

[2]  Dirk Morrison,et al.  Distance Training: How Innovative Organizations are using Technology to Maximize Learning and Meet Business Objectives , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  T. Urdan,et al.  Corporate elearning: exploring a new frontier , 2000 .

[4]  Raden Dunbar.  Adapting Distance Education for Indonesians: Problems with Learner Heteronomy and a Strong Oral Tradition. , 1991 .

[5]  E. Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1984, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  Terence Brake,et al.  Doing Business Internationally: The Guide To Cross-Cultural Success , 2002 .

[7]  Alistair Sutcliffe,et al.  Human-Computer Interface Design , 1988, Macmillan Computer Science Series.

[8]  Tom Carey,et al.  Engagement as a Design Concept for Multimedia , 1995 .

[9]  Dimane Mpoeleng,et al.  Human-computer interface design issues for a multi-cultural and multi-lingual English speaking country Botswana , 2001, Interact. Comput..

[10]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Constructing User-Centered Websites: The Early Design Phases of Small to Medium Sites , 2000 .

[11]  M. Keaney.  Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business , 1999 .

[12]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[13]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  The Role of Culture in Interface Acceptance , 1997, INTERACT.

[14]  Y. Aharoni.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[15]  Robert Maribe Branch.  Educational Technology Frameworks that Facilitate Culturally Pluralistic Instruction. , 1997 .

[16]  Angela M. Cirucci,et al.  Usability Testing , 2021, UX Research Methods for Media and Communication Studies.

[17]  Néstor J. Rodríguez,et al.  Guidelines for designing usable World Wide Web pages , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[18]  T. Gladwin.  Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1981 .

[19]  Marc J. Rosenberg,et al.  E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age , 2000 .

[20]  E. Hall,et al.  Understanding Cultural Differences , 1989 .

[21]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[22]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Security concerns of system users: A study of perceptions of the adequacy of security , 1991, Inf. Manag..

[23]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[24]  R. John Brockmann,et al.  Handbook of screen format design , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[25]  Ben L. Kedia,et al.  Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology Across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management , 1988 .

[26]  Aaron Marcus,et al.  Cultural Dimensions and Global Web User-Interface Design , 2000 .

[27]  Martyn Wild,et al.  Contextualizing learning in the World Wide Web: accounting for the impact of culture , 1998, Education and Information Technologies.

[28]  L. Henderson.  Instructional design of interactive multimedia: A cultural critique , 1996 .

[29]  Masaaki Kurosu,et al.  Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[30]  Chandler Stolp,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1983 .

[31]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  An Evaluator Looks at Cultural Diversity. , 1997 .

[32]  Catherine McLoughlin,et al.  Culturally responsive technology use: developing an on-line community of learners , 1999, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[33]  김종식.  동아시아 문화와 경영, Geert Hofstede, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications, 1980) ; and Cultures and Organizations : Software of the Mind (New York:McGraw-Hill, 1997) , 1999 .

[34]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[35]  Diane J. Hanson,et al.  E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[36]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Distance Training: How Innovative Organizations are Using Technology to Maximize Learning and Meet Business Objectives , 1998 .

[37]  Angeliki Poulymenakou,et al.  Designing On-Line Learning Courses : Implications for Usability , 2002 .

[38]  Alaina Kanfer,et al.  1 e-learning-A Review of Literature , 2000 .

[39]  Kenneth Maxwell.  Human-Computer Interface Design Issues , 1999 .