Viability theory for an ecosystem approach to fisheries

Maintenance of overall ecosystem complexity is perceived as critical to the sustainability of ecosystem use. The development of an operational basis for an ecosystem approach to fisheries, however, faces many difficulties. On the research side, the challenge is in defining proper long-term, ecosystem-related objectives; determining meaningful reference values and indicators for desirable or undesirable states of the ecosystem; and developing appropriate data collection, analytical tools and models. The “viability” concept developed in economics by Jean-Pierre Aubin can be used to assist in the definition, selection of, and interaction among long-term objectives at an ecosystem level. It recognizes that ecosystems are complex assemblages of interacting and self-organizing natural and human components that cannot be predicted. Viability models define an ensemble of “viable states”, in contrast to undesirable states defined as such by ecological, economic, and/or social constraints. These constraints can be derived from fisheries objectives, conservation principles, scientific results of modelling, or precautionary principles, and correspond to limit reference points to be avoided. Viability theory does not attempt to choose any “optimal solution” according to given criteria, but selects “viable evolutions”. These evolutions are compatible with the constraints in the sense that they satisfy them at each time and can be delineated by the viability kernel. The southern Benguela marine ecosystem is presented as a first attempt for the application of this theory. In defining ecosystem-based objectives (and related issues such as target reference points), it seems more difficult to reach consensus among stakeholders on what is desirable than on what is undesirable (e.g. biological or economic collapse, species extinction, displacement of local rural communities). Expressed in the negative form or as limit reference points, ecosystem-based constraints can be considered simultaneously with current target reference points, such as maximum sustainable yield, using viability models. The viability approach can help to progressively integrate ecosystem considerations, such as conservation, into fisheries management.

[1]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[2]  P. Cury,et al.  Hunting became a secondary activity 2000 years ago: marine fishing did the same in 2021 , 2001 .

[3]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Towards sustainability in world fisheries , 2002, Nature.

[4]  André E. Punt,et al.  Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives , 2000 .

[5]  P. Mace.  a new role for MSY in single-species and ecosystem approaches to fisheries stock assessment and management , 2001 .

[6]  Serge M. Garcia,et al.  Global overview of marine fisheries. , 2003 .

[7]  Hawkins,et al.  Extinction risk in the sea. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Noël Bonneuil,et al.  Viable populations in a prey–predator system , 1997 .

[9]  C. Walters,et al.  Structuring dynamic models of exploited ecosystems from trophic mass-balance assessments , 1997, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[10]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Reinventing fisheries management , 1998 .

[11]  P. A. Larkin.  An Epitaph for the Concept of Maximum Sustained Yield , 1977 .

[12]  Astrid Jarre,et al.  Trophic flows in the southern Benguela during the 1980s and 1990s , 2003 .

[13]  M. Tegner,et al.  Ecosystem effects of fishing. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  Hartmut Bossel,et al.  Assessing Viability and Sustainability: a Systems-based Approach for Deriving Comprehensive Indicator Sets , 2002 .

[15]  Milner B. Schaefer.  Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries , 1991 .

[16]  Christophe Béné,et al.  Storage and Viability of a Fishery with Resource and Market Dephased Seasonalities , 2000 .

[17]  Jean-Pierre Aubin,et al.  Viability theory , 1991 .

[18]  Jason S. Link,et al.  Ecological Considerations in Fisheries Management: When Does it Matter? , 2002 .

[19]  C. Fowler,et al.  Limits to natural variation: implications for systemic management , 2002 .

[20]  Astrid Jarre,et al.  Small pelagics in upwelling systems: patterns of interaction and structural changes in "wasp-waist" ecosystems , 2000 .

[21]  Thomas M. Powell,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY EFFECTS ON MARINE FISHERIES: FOUR CASE HISTORIES , 1998 .

[22]  J. F. Caddy,et al.  Limit reference points, traffic lights, and holistic approaches to fisheries management with minimal stock assessment input , 2002 .

[23]  S. Garcia,et al.  Sustainability reference systems and indicators for responsible marine capture fisheries: a review of concepts and elements for a set of guidelines , 2000 .

[24]  Ragnar Arnason,et al.  Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem , 2003 .

[25]  Philippe Cury,et al.  The functioning of marine ecosystems: a fisheries perspective. , 2003 .

[26]  S. Jennings,et al.  Marine Fisheries Ecology , 2001 .

[27]  Christophe Béné,et al.  A viability analysis for a bio-economic model , 2001 .

[28]  Chuck Hollingworth,et al.  Ecosystem Effects of Fishing Preface , 2000 .

[29]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries , 2000 .

[30]  Jason S. Link,et al.  Models of predation and fishing mortality in aquatic ecosystems , 2000 .

[31]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Rebuilding ecosystems, not sustainability, as the proper goal of fishery management , 1998 .

[32]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[33]  Francis Laloë,et al.  Co-viabilité des systèmes halieutiques" , 1999 .