Effectiveness of three‐dimensional digital animation in teaching human anatomy in an authentic classroom context

Three‐dimensional (3D) digital animations were used to teach the human musculoskeletal system to first year kinesiology students. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of this method by comparing two groups from two different academic years during two of their official required anatomy examinations (trunk and upper limb assessments). During the upper limb section, the teacher used two‐dimensional (2D) drawings embedded into PowerPoint® slides and 3D digital animations for the first group (2D group) and the second (3D group), respectively. The same 3D digital animations were used for both groups during the trunk section. The only difference between the two was the multimedia used to present the information during the upper limb section. The 2D group surprisingly outperformed the 3D group on the trunk assessment. On the upper limb assessment no difference in the scores on the overall anatomy examination was found. However, the 3D group outperformed the 2D group in questions requiring spatial ability. Data supported that 3D digital animations were effective instructional multimedia material tools in teaching human anatomy especially in recalling anatomical knowledge requiring spatial ability. The importance of evaluating the effectiveness of a new instructional material outside laboratory environment (e.g., after a complete semester and on official examinations) was discussed. Anat Sci Educ 7: 430–437. © 2014 American Association of Anatomists.

[1]  D. R. Montello,et al.  The Role of Spatial Cognition in Medicine: Applications for Selecting and Training Professionals. , 2007 .

[2]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Computer visualizations: Factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[3]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[4]  S. Daniel,et al.  Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer‐generated three‐dimensional anatomical ear model , 2006, Medical education.

[5]  M. Khalil,et al.  Comparison of computer‐based and paper‐based imagery strategies in learning anatomy , 2005, Clinical anatomy.

[6]  H. A. Witkin.  A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[7]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Relationship Between Spatial Abilities, Mental Rotation and Functional Anatomy Learning , 2007, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[8]  D. Risucci.  Visual spatial perception and surgical competence. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[9]  M. Hegarty.  Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  K. Fung,et al.  Role of a computer-generated three-dimensional laryngeal model in anatomy teaching for advanced learners , 2011, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[11]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Spatial Reasoning With External Visualizations: What Matters Is What You See, Not Whether You Interact , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  S. Moorman,et al.  Prof-in-a-Box: using internet-videoconferencing to assist students in the gross anatomy laboratory , 2006, BMC medical education.

[13]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning , 2004 .

[14]  Stephan Schwan,et al.  Learning with Hyperlinked Videos--Design Criteria and Efficient Strategies for Using Audiovisual Hypermedia. , 2004 .

[15]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1998, The Lancet.

[17]  Glenn Regehr,et al.  Exploring the Changing Learning Environment of the Gross Anatomy Lab , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[19]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  G. Norman,et al.  How medical students learn spatial anatomy , 2001, The Lancet.

[21]  Jean-Michel Boucheix,et al.  Supporting Relational Processing in Complex Animated Diagrams , 2008, Diagrams.

[22]  K. Rochford.  Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students , 1985, Medical education.

[23]  J. Kooloos,et al.  Learning anatomy enhances spatial ability , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[24]  Ethan D Grober,et al.  Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance. , 2003, Surgery.

[25]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[26]  P. O'Sullivan,et al.  Effect of the use of instructional anatomy videos on student performance , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[27]  S. Ainsworth,et al.  Multiple Forms of Dynamic Representation. , 2004 .

[28]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[29]  Diane C. Calleson,et al.  The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: Are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection? , 2007, Clinical anatomy.

[30]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Enhancement of Mental Rotation Abilities and Its Effect on Anatomy Learning , 2009, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[31]  M. Hegarty.  Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions , 2004 .

[32]  Mireille Bétrancourt,et al.  Les animations sont-elles vraiment plus efficaces ? , 2000 .

[33]  Carla A. Romney,et al.  Effect of visual–spatial ability on medical students' performance in a gross anatomy course , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[34]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[35]  Hans Spada,et al.  The Active Integration of Information during Learning with Dynamic and Interactive Visualisations , 2004 .

[36]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[37]  P. Chandler,et al.  The crucial role of cognitive processes in the design of dynamic visualizations , 2004 .

[38]  Victoria A Roach,et al.  Is three‐dimensional videography the cutting edge of surgical skill acquisition? , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[39]  O. Hyder,et al.  Dissection videos do not improve anatomy examination scores , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[40]  Christopher Wenger,et al.  Anatomy in a New Curriculum: Facilitating the Learning of Gross Anatomy using Web Access Streaming Dissection Videos , 2006, Journal of visual communication in medicine.