Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions

Current models of eukaryotic chemotaxis propose that directional sensing causes localized generation of new pseudopods. However, quantitative analysis of pseudopod generation suggests a fundamentally different mechanism for chemotaxis in shallow gradients: first, pseudopods in multiple cell types are usually generated when existing ones bifurcate and are rarely made de novo; second, in Dictyostelium cells in shallow chemoattractant gradients, pseudopods are made at the same rate whether cells are moving up or down gradients. The location and direction of new pseudopods are random within the range allowed by bifurcation and are not oriented by chemoattractants. Thus, pseudopod generation is controlled independently of chemotactic signalling. Third, directional sensing is mediated by maintaining the most accurate existing pseudopod, rather than through the generation of new ones. Finally, the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI(3)K) inhibitor LY294002 affects the frequency of pseudopod generation, but not the accuracy of selection, suggesting that PI(3)K regulates the underlying mechanism of cell movement, rather than control of direction.

[1]  W. Loomis,et al.  Intracellular Role of Adenylyl Cyclase in Regulation of Lateral Pseudopod Formation during Dictyostelium Chemotaxis , 2005, Eukaryotic Cell.

[2]  D. Soll,et al.  Ponticulin plays a role in the positional stabilization of pseudopods , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  R. Firtel,et al.  The molecular genetics of chemotaxis: sensing and responding to chemoattractant gradients , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[4]  R. Insall,et al.  PIR121 Regulates Pseudopod Dynamics and SCAR Activity in Dictyostelium , 2003, Current Biology.

[5]  S. Zigmond,et al.  Cell polarity: an examination of its behavioral expression and its consequences for polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotaxis , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  O. Weiner,et al.  Regulation of cell polarity during eukaryotic chemotaxis: the chemotactic compass. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[7]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells: a focus on leukocytes and Dictyostelium. , 1988, Annual review of cell biology.

[8]  H. Meinhardt Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[9]  H. Bourne,et al.  A chemical compass. , 2002, Nature.

[10]  R. Klemke,et al.  ERK and RhoA Differentially Regulate Pseudopodia Growth and Retraction during Chemotaxis* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  M. Carlier,et al.  Actin-based motility as a self-organized system: mechanism and reconstitution in vitro. , 2003, Comptes rendus biologies.

[12]  B. Pearce Models and Mechanisms , 2003 .

[13]  R T Tranquillo,et al.  A stochastic model for leukocyte random motility and chemotaxis based on receptor binding fluctuations , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  G. Laevsky,et al.  Under-agarose folate chemotaxis of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae in permissive and mechanically inhibited conditions. , 2001, BioTechniques.

[15]  M. Titus,et al.  A Dictyostelium myosin I plays a crucial role in regulating the frequency of pseudopods formed on the substratum. , 1996, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[16]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Uniform cAMP stimulation of Dictyostelium cells induces localized patches of signal transduction and pseudopodia. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[17]  D. Taylor,et al.  Local and spatially coordinated movements in Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae during chemotaxis , 1982, Cell.

[18]  Zigmond Sh Ability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to orient in gradients of chemotactic factors. , 1977 .

[19]  D. Murphy,et al.  G Protein Signaling Events Are Activated at the Leading Edge of Chemotactic Cells , 1998, Cell.

[20]  H U Keller,et al.  Chemotactic reorientation of granulocytes stimulated with micropipettes containing fMet-Leu-Phe. , 1981, Journal of cell science.

[21]  Joachim Goedhart,et al.  Sensitization of Dictyostelium chemotaxis by phosphoinositide-3-kinase-mediated self-organizing signalling patches , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  T. Meyer,et al.  A local coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis. , 2005, Developmental cell.

[23]  M. Glogauer,et al.  Rac1 is the small GTPase responsible for regulating the neutrophil chemotaxis compass. , 2004, Blood.

[24]  P. Iglesias,et al.  Two complementary, local excitation, global inhibition mechanisms acting in parallel can explain the chemoattractant-induced regulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 response in dictyostelium cells. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[25]  W. Uttal On models and mechanisms , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Two phases of actin polymerization display different dependencies on PI(3,4,5)P3 accumulation and have unique roles during chemotaxis. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[27]  G. Nash,et al.  Continuous activation and deactivation of integrin CD11b/CD18 during de novo expression enables rolling neutrophils to immobilize on platelets. , 1996, Blood.

[28]  William F. Loomis,et al.  RasC Plays a Role in Transduction of Temporal Gradient Information in the Cyclic-AMP Wave of Dictyostelium discoideum , 2004, Eukaryotic Cell.

[29]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  A diffusion-translocation model for gradient sensing by chemotactic cells. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[30]  T. O'Halloran,et al.  Abp1 regulates pseudopodium number in chemotaxing Dictyostelium cells , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[31]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Eukaryotic Chemotaxis: Distinctions between Directional Sensing and Polarization* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  J. Murray,et al.  Myosin IB null mutants of Dictyostelium exhibit abnormalities in motility. , 1991, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.