Automatic monitoring system for individual dairy cows based on a deep learning framework that provides identification via body parts and estimation of body condition score.

Body condition score (BCS) is a common tool for indirectly estimating the mobilization of energy reserves in the fat and muscle of cattle that meets the requirements of animal welfare and precision livestock farming for the effective monitoring of individual animals. However, previous studies on automatic BCS systems have used manual scoring for data collection, and traditional image extraction methods have limited model performance accuracy. In addition, the radio frequency identification device system commonly used in ranching has the disadvantages of misreadings and damage to bovine bodies. Therefore, the aim of this research was to develop and validate an automatic system for identifying individuals and assessing BCS using a deep learning framework. This work developed a linear regression model of BCS using ultrasound backfat thickness to determine BCS for training sets and tested a system based on convolutional neural networks with 3 channels, including depth, gray, and phase congruency, to analyze the back images of 686 cows. After we performed an analysis of image model performance, online verification was used to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the system. The results showed that the selected linear regression model had a high coefficient of determination value (0.976), and the correlation coefficient between manual BCS and ultrasonic BCS was 0.94. Although the overall accuracy of the BCS estimations was high (0.45, 0.77, and 0.98 within 0, 0.25, and 0.5 unit, respectively), the validation for actual BCS ranging from 3.25 to 3.5 was weak (the F1 scores were only 0.6 and 0.57, respectively, within the 0.25-unit range). Overall, individual identification and BCS assessment performed well in the online measurement, with accuracies of 0.937 and 0.409, respectively. A system for individual identification and BCS assessment was developed, and a convolutional neural network using depth, gray, and phase congruency channels to interpret image features exhibited advantages for monitoring thin cows.

[1]  P. Wettemann,et al.  Does animal welfare influence dairy farm efficiency? A two-stage approach. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  I Halachmi,et al.  Cow body shape and automation of condition scoring. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Machine Learning for High-Throughput Stress Phenotyping in Plants. , 2016, Trends in plant science.

[4]  D. Berckmans,et al.  Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems. , 2014, Revue scientifique et technique.

[5]  Andreas Uhl,et al.  A survey on biometric cryptosystems and cancelable biometrics , 2011, EURASIP J. Inf. Secur..

[6]  R Staufenbiel,et al.  Invited review: Methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of backfat thickness. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  E Vasseur,et al.  Development and implementation of a training program to ensure high repeatability of body condition scoring of dairy cows. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  H A Hussein,et al.  Relationship between body condition score and ultrasound measurement of backfat thickness in multiparous Holstein dairy cows at different production phases. , 2013, Australian veterinary journal.

[9]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[10]  Clarice Garcia Borges Demétrio,et al.  Validation of body condition score as a predictor of subcutaneous fat in Nelore (Bos indicus) cows. , 2009 .

[11]  Ali Ismail Awad,et al.  From classical methods to animal biometrics: A review on cattle identification and tracking , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[12]  Alejandro Zunino,et al.  Body condition estimation on cows from depth images using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[13]  Wolfgang Junge,et al.  Estimation of backfat thickness using extracted traits from an automatic 3D optical system in lactating Holstein-Friesian cows , 2014 .

[14]  Jean-Marie Aerts,et al.  Is precision livestock farming an engineer's daydream or nightmare, an animal's friend or foe, and a farmer's panacea or pitfall? , 2008 .

[15]  Ilan Halachmi,et al.  Automatic assessment of dairy cattle body condition score using thermal imaging , 2013 .

[16]  D T Galligan,et al.  Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  Andreas Kamilaris,et al.  Deep learning in agriculture: A survey , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[18]  Alejandro Zunino,et al.  Estimating Body Condition Score in Dairy Cows From Depth Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks, Transfer Learning and Model Ensembling Techniques , 2019, Agronomy.

[19]  Yu-Jun Zheng,et al.  Predicting gastrointestinal infection morbidity based on environmental pollutants: Deep learning versus traditional models , 2017 .

[20]  J M Bewley,et al.  Potential for estimation of body condition scores in dairy cattle from digital images. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Yael Edan,et al.  Development of automatic body condition scoring using a low-cost 3-dimensional Kinect camera. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  Lin Wang,et al.  Automatic individual identification of Holstein dairy cows using tailhead images , 2017 .

[23]  Jian Sun,et al.  Individual identification of dairy cows based on convolutional neural networks , 2019, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[24]  I Halachmi,et al.  Development of an automatic cow body condition scoring using body shape signature and Fourier descriptors. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  J R Roche,et al.  Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  G. C. Guarnera,et al.  Objective estimation of body condition score by modeling cow body shape from digital images. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  Thomas B Farver,et al.  A Body Condition Scoring Chart for Holstein Dairy Cows , 1989 .

[28]  Jinghua Li,et al.  Depth map enhancement method based on joint bilateral filter , 2014, 2014 7th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[29]  L. Ruiz-Garcia,et al.  The role of RFID in agriculture: Applications, limitations and challenges , 2011 .

[30]  H. D. Larsen,et al.  Improved animal welfare, the right technology and increased business. , 2016, Meat science.

[31]  P. Faverdin,et al.  Rear shape in 3 dimensions summarized by principal component analysis is a good predictor of body condition score in Holstein dairy cows. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Densely Connected Convolutional Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).