Digital Evidence Certainty Descriptors (DECDs)
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Graeme Horsman,et al. Raiders of the lost artefacts: Championing the need for digital forensics research , 2019, Forensic Science International: Reports.
[2] Graeme Horsman,et al. Framework for Reliable Experimental Design (FRED): A research framework to ensure the dependable interpretation of digital data for digital forensics , 2018, Comput. Secur..
[3] Anders Nordgaard,et al. The likelihood ratio as value of evidence—more than a question of numbers , 2012 .
[4] Graeme Horsman,et al. A case-based reasoning method for locating evidence during digital forensic device triage , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..
[5] W. Thompson,et al. Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents. , 2015, Law and human behavior.
[6] Richard E. Overill,et al. Quantification of digital forensic hypotheses using probability theory , 2013, 2013 8th International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensics Engineering (SADFE).
[7] Filipo Sharevski. Rules of professional responsibility in digital forensics: A comparative analysis , 2015, J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law.
[8] Cedric Neumann,et al. An argument against presenting interval quantifications as a surrogate for the value of evidence. , 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[9] Graeme Horsman,et al. Formalising investigative decision making in digital forensics: Proposing the Digital Evidence Reporting and Decision Support (DERDS) framework , 2019, Digit. Investig..
[10] Law. Policy. Executive Summary of the National Academies of Science Reports, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2009 .
[11] James M Curran,et al. Admitting to uncertainty in the LR. , 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[12] Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? , 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[13] Nenagh Kemp,et al. Forensic scientists' conclusions: how readable are they for non-scientist report-users? , 2013, Forensic science international.
[14] Ian Watkins,et al. The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect. , 2013, Law and human behavior.
[15] Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems. , 2011, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[16] Charles E H Berger,et al. The LR does not exist. , 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[17] Steven P. Lund,et al. Likelihood Ratio as Weight of Forensic Evidence: A Closer Look. , 2017, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[18] Debra Littlejohn Shinder,et al. Scene of the Cybercrime , 2002 .
[19] Michael J. Saks,et al. The Testimony of Forensic Identification Science: What Expert Witnesses Say and What Factfinders Hear , 2009, Law and human behavior.
[20] Eoghan Casey,et al. Clearly conveying digital forensic results , 2018, Digit. Investig..
[21] Ricky Ansell,et al. Scale of conclusions for the value of evidence , 2012 .
[22] William C. Thompson. Discussion Paper: Hard Cases Make Bad Law -- Reactions to R v. T , 2012 .
[23] Richard E. Overill. Quantifying Likelihood in Digital Forensic Investigations , 2014 .
[24] Peter Sommer. Meetings between experts: A route to simpler, fairer trials? , 2009, Digit. Investig..
[25] P. Sommer. Certification, registration and assessment of digital forensic experts: The UK experience , 2011, Digit. Investig..
[26] Eoghan Casey. Error, Uncertainty and Loss in Digital Evidence , 2002, Int. J. Digit. EVid..