Using phenocams to monitor our changing Earth: toward a global phenocam network

Rapid changes to the biosphere are altering ecological processes worldwide. Developing informed policies for mitigating the impacts of environmental change requires an exponential increase in the quantity, diversity, and resolution of field-collected data, which, in turn, necessitates greater reliance on innovative technologies to monitor ecological processes across local to global scales. Automated digital time-lapse cameras – “phenocams” – can monitor vegetation status and environmental changes over long periods of time. Phenocams are ideal for documenting changes in phenology, snow cover, fire frequency, and other disturbance events. However, effective monitoring of global environmental change with phenocams requires adoption of data standards. New continental-scale ecological research networks, such as the US National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) and the European Union's Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS), can serve as templates for developing rigorous data standards and extending the utility of phenocam data through standardized ground-truthing. Open-source tools for analysis, visualization, and collaboration will make phenocam data more widely usable.

[1]  Steven M. Seitz,et al.  Time-lapse mining from internet photos , 2015, ACM Trans. Graph..

[2]  Andrew I. Su,et al.  Omics Pipe: a community-based framework for reproducible multi-omics data analysis , 2015, Bioinform..

[3]  E. Nikinmaa,et al.  Interpreting canopy development and physiology using the EUROPhen camera network at flux sites , 2015 .

[4]  Oliver Sonnentag,et al.  Greenness indices from digital cameras predict the timing and seasonal dynamics of canopy-scale photosynthesis. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  Utilization of ground-based digital photography for the evaluation of seasonal changes in the aboveground green biomass and foliage phenology in a grassland ecosystem , 2015, Ecol. Informatics.

[6]  S. Nagai,et al.  Review: Development of an in situ observation network for terrestrial ecological remote sensing: the Phenological Eyes Network (PEN) , 2015, Ecological Research.

[7]  Mike H. MacGregor,et al.  Seasonal wireless sensor network link performance in boreal forest phenology monitoring , 2014, 2014 Eleventh Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON).

[8]  M. Rossini,et al.  Using digital camera images to analyse snowmelt and phenology of a subalpine grassland , 2014 .

[9]  Youngryel Ryu,et al.  Digital canopy photography: Exposed and in the raw , 2014 .

[10]  Andrew D. Richardson,et al.  Monitoring vegetation phenology using an infrared-enabled security camera , 2014 .

[11]  Andrew I. Su,et al.  Omics Pipe: A Computational Framework for Reproducible Multi-Omics Data Analysis , 2014, bioRxiv.

[12]  Kenlo Nishida Nasahara,et al.  Detection of the different characteristics of year-to-year variation in foliage phenology among deciduous broad-leaved tree species by using daily continuous canopy surface images , 2014, Ecol. Informatics.

[13]  Patrick J. Guertin,et al.  Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plant and animal activity for science and resource management applications , 2014, International Journal of Biometeorology.

[14]  N. Coops,et al.  Monitoring plant condition and phenology using infrared sensitive consumer grade digital cameras , 2014 .

[15]  Pamela L. Nagler,et al.  Rapid dispersal of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) biocontrol beetles (Diorhabda carinulata) on a desert river detected by phenocams, MODIS imagery and ground observations , 2014 .

[16]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles , 2014 .

[17]  Doreen S. Boyd,et al.  Exploring the Potential for Automatic Extraction of Vegetation Phenological Metrics from Traffic Webcams , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Philippe Bonnet,et al.  EcoIP: An open source image analysis toolkit to identify different stages of plant phenology for multiple species with pan-tilt-zoom cameras , 2013, Ecol. Informatics.

[19]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[20]  Robert Pless,et al.  Collaborative imaging of urban forest dynamics: augmenting re-photography to visualize changes over time , 2013, Electronic Imaging.

[21]  O. Sonnentag,et al.  Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system , 2013 .

[22]  Andrew D. Richardson,et al.  Near-Surface Sensor-Derived Phenology , 2013 .

[23]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  Continuous observation of tree leaf area index at ecosystem scale using upward-pointing digital cameras , 2012 .

[24]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms , 2012, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[25]  Arfon Smith,et al.  The notes from nature tool for unlocking biodiversity records from museum records through citizen science , 2012, ZooKeys.

[26]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Ecological impacts of a widespread frost event following early spring leaf‐out , 2012 .

[27]  S. Wich,et al.  Dawn of Drone Ecology: Low-Cost Autonomous Aerial Vehicles for Conservation , 2012 .

[28]  P. Leadley,et al.  Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[29]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Digital repeat photography for phenological research in forest ecosystems , 2012 .

[30]  Tim Brown,et al.  High-resolution, time-lapse imaging for ecosystem-scale phenotyping in the field. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[31]  D. Lobell,et al.  Climate Trends and Global Crop Production Since 1980 , 2011, Science.

[32]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Public Internet‐connected cameras used as a cross‐continental ground‐based plant phenology monitoring system , 2010 .

[33]  Rachel Cardell-Oliver,et al.  Harnessing wireless sensor technologies to advance forest ecology and agricultural research. , 2010 .

[34]  Robert Pless,et al.  The global network of outdoor webcams: properties and applications , 2009, GIS.

[35]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Intercomparison, interpretation, and assessment of spring phenology in North America estimated from remote sensing for 1982–2006 , 2009 .

[36]  H. Wanner,et al.  Tree phenology and carbon dioxide fluxes - use of digital photography for process-based interpretation at the ecosystem scale , 2009 .

[37]  Andrew D Richardson,et al.  Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal variation in canopy phenology. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[38]  J. Abatzoglou,et al.  Tracking the rhythm of the seasons in the face of global change: phenological research in the 21st century. , 2009 .

[39]  William W. Hargrove,et al.  A continental strategy for the National Ecological Observatory Network , 2008 .

[40]  Michael A. Crimmins,et al.  Monitoring Plant Phenology Using Digital Repeat Photography , 2008, Environmental management.

[41]  D. Hollinger,et al.  Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest , 2007, Oecologia.

[42]  B. Potts,et al.  A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[43]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Color enhancement of highly correlated images. II. Channel ratio and “chromaticity” transformation techniques , 1987 .