Seismic Retrofitting of RC Frames: A Rational Strategy Based on Genetic Algorithms

This paper outlines a rational strategy for retrofitting Reinforced Concrete (RC), which is based on combing member- and structure-level techniques in order to achieve optimal design objectives in a Performance-Based approach. Member-level techniques (such as confinement with composite materials, steel or concrete jacketing) are supposed to enhance capacity of single members, whereas structure-level techniques (generally based on introducing steel bracings systems or shear walls) aim to reduce the seismic demand on the existing frame as a whole. A novel procedure, based on a “dedicated” genetic algorithms, is developed by the authors for selecting “optimal” retrofitting solutions, among the technically feasible ones, obtained by combining alternative configurations of steel bracing systems and FRP-confinement of critical members. The main assumptions about the representations of “individuals” and the main information about the genetic operations (i.e. selection, crossover and mutation) are summarised in the paper. Finally, a sample application of the procedure is proposed with the aim to demonstrate its potential in selecting rational retrofitting solutions.

[1]  C. Reeves Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems , 1993 .

[2]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Soft computing methodologies for structural optimization , 2003, Appl. Soft Comput..

[3]  C. Darwin The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[4]  Prabhat Hajela,et al.  Stochastic search in structural optimization - Genetic algorithms and simulated annealing , 1993, SOSP 1993.

[5]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making Methods for Seismic Structural Retrofitting , 2009, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[6]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Seismic retrofit schemes for RC structures and local‐global consequences , 2006 .

[7]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  OpenSees-SNOPT Framework for Finite-Element-Based Optimization of Structural and Geotechnical Systems , 2012 .

[8]  Fabio Biondini,et al.  Optimal limit states design of concrete structures using genetic algorithms , 1999 .

[9]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Experimental Investigations of a Selective Weakening Approach for the Seismic Retrofit of R.C. Walls , 2007 .

[10]  Geremia Costantino Interpretazione dei criteri di progettazione dei muri di sostegno in zona sismica secondo il D.M. 14 gennaio 2008 - Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. , 2008 .

[11]  D. A. Nethercot,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1993-1-1 : Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures : General Rules and Rules for Buildings /L. Gardner and D. A. Nethercot , 2005 .

[12]  Adam Lipowski,et al.  Roulette-wheel selection via stochastic acceptance , 2011, ArXiv.

[13]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost , 2006 .

[14]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Performance-based optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete structures , 2008 .

[15]  R. Park,et al.  Flexural Members with Confined Concrete , 1971 .

[16]  HASAN KAPLAN,et al.  Seismic strengthening of RC structures with exterior shear walls , 2011 .

[17]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra , 1999 .

[18]  R. Park,et al.  Repair and Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Buildings for Seismic Resistance , 1991 .

[19]  W. M. Jenkins,et al.  Towards structural optimization via the genetic algorithm , 1991 .