UNDERSTANDING CONSUMERS ATTITUDE TOWARD ADVERTISING

Literature in advertising and information systems suggests that advertising in both traditional media and the Internet is either easily ignored by the audience or is perceived with little value. However, these studies assumed that the audience was passive and failed to consider the motives of the users. In light of this, the present study measures consumers’ attitudes toward advertisements for different purposes/functions (brand building and directional) and different media (traditional and Internet-based). Literature suggests the following factors that contribute to consumers’ perceptions of ads: entertainment, irritation, informativeness, credibility, and demographic. We believe that interactivity is also a factor that contributes to consumers’ perceptions. By understanding consumers’ attitude towards advertising, designers and marketers can better strategize their advertising designs. A better understanding of interactivity can also help to improve the effectiveness of interactive media such as the Internet. A methodology for studying the factors that contribute to consumers perceptions of ads is proposed and implications for Internet-based advertising and e-commerce is discussed.

[1]  Alice E. Courtney,et al.  Advertising in America: The Consumer View , 1969 .

[2]  E. Katz,et al.  The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III. , 1975 .

[3]  Wayne M. Towers,et al.  Media Advertising Credibility , 1976 .

[4]  Ernest F. Larkin,et al.  Consumer Perceptions of the Media and their Advertising Content , 1979 .

[5]  J. Blumler The Role of Theory in Uses and Gratifications Studies , 1979 .

[6]  John D. Leckenby,et al.  Student Attitudes toward Advertising: Institution vs. Instrument , 1980 .

[7]  Alan M. Rubin,et al.  An Examination of Television Viewing Motivations , 1981 .

[8]  H. Keith Hunt Advertising in a new age , 1981 .

[9]  A. Rubin Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations , 1983 .

[10]  David W. Stewart,et al.  Speculations on the Future of Advertising Research , 1992 .

[11]  Linda F. Alwitt,et al.  Identifying who dislikes television advertising: not by demographics alone , 1994 .

[12]  Robert H. Ducoffe How Consumers Assess the Value of Advertising , 1995 .

[13]  Jerry Martin Rosenberg Dictionary of Marketing and Advertising , 1995 .

[14]  Robert H. Ducoffe ADVERTISING VALUE AND ADVERTISING ON THE WEB , 1996 .

[15]  N. Hollis,et al.  Advertising on the Web: is there response before click-through? , 1997 .

[16]  John Eighmey Profiling user responses to commercial web sites , 1997 .

[17]  S. Haeckel About the Nature and Future of Interactive Marketing , 1998 .

[18]  B. Calder,et al.  New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising , 1998 .

[19]  Karen V. Fernandez,et al.  The Effectiveness of Information and Color in Yellow Pages Advertising , 2000 .

[20]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Animation on Information Seeking Performance on the World Wide Web: Securing Attention or Interfering with Primary Tasks? , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Lana K. Brackett,et al.  Cyberspace Advertising vs. Other Media: Consumer vs. Mature Student Attitudes , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[22]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  Signaling Quality and Credibility in Yellow Pages Advertising: The Influence of Color and Graphics on Choice , 2001 .

[23]  Yuping Liu Interactivity and its implications for consumer behavior , 2002 .

[24]  R. Rettie,et al.  Does internet advertising alienate users , 2003 .