The Influence of Process Acceptance on BPM: An Empirical Investigation

Business processes and the management thereof can create value for companies. This expected contribution of BPM may only unfold if the processes are executed as designed. The execution in itself is dependant on an initial process trigger. A decision not to trigger the business process or to modify it during execution depends on the subject's process acceptance. It is thus self-evident that ill accepted processes impact the efforts to standardize processes negatively. This paper investigates factors which influence process acceptance throughout the entire life cycle. A cycle that includes the creation, implementation, execution, and control of business processes. 21 in-depth expert interviews are used to identify these factors. Results indicate that process acceptance is formed by the organizational context, the process (model) itself, and the involved subjects. This implies a necessity of understanding social mechanisms, which influence process acceptance, in the process design phase. Especially process model properties such as fail-safe and feedback mechanisms, perceived process length, number of participants, and resource constraints are found to influence process acceptance. Further findings and insights presented in this paper should be considered during process modelling to archive higher process acceptance among relevant stakeholders.

[1]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: A Survey , 2003, Business Process Management.

[3]  Leslie M. Marx,et al.  Process Variation as a Determinant of Service Quality and Bank Performance: Evidence from the Retail Banking Study , 1997 .

[4]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior , 2008, Inf. Syst..

[5]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Understanding behavioral sources of process variation following enterprise system deployment , 2008 .

[6]  Volker Nissen,et al.  When Processes Alienate Customers: Towards a Theory of Process Acceptance , 2014, S-BPM ONE.

[7]  Didar Zowghi,et al.  Critical success factors for software process improvement implementation: an empirical study , 2006, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[8]  Benjamin Pfaff Process Management A Guide For The Design Of Business Processes , 2016 .

[9]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Verification of Forbidden Behavior in EPCs , 2006, Modellierung.

[10]  Paulo Rupino da Cunha,et al.  Business Processes The Way They Should Be: Tuning For Low Friction And Sustainability , 2013, ECIS.

[11]  Michael Pidd,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  If we build it, they will come: Designing information systems that people want to use , 1994 .

[13]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The service system is the basic abstraction of service science , 2009, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[14]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[15]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[16]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[17]  Tracy Hall,et al.  De-motivators for software process improvement: an analysis of practitioners' views , 2003, J. Syst. Softw..

[18]  Udo Kannengiesser,et al.  Subsuming the BPM Life Cycle in an Ontological Framework of Designing , 2008, CIAO! / EOMAS.

[19]  May Kay Kramp Kramp, May Kay, "Exploring Life and Experience through Narrative Inquiry," pp. 103-122 in Kathleen de Marrais and Stephen D. Lapan, eds., Foundations for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004. , 2004 .

[20]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center , 2016 .

[21]  Kath Bhanot,et al.  Preliminary fact finding mission following the accident at the nuclear fuel processing facility in Tokaimura, Japan (Vienna: IAEA) , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[22]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  Business process management: a boundaryless approach to modern competitiveness , 1997, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[23]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Managing Process Variants in the Process Life Cycle , 2007, ICEIS.

[24]  Daniel J. Hruschka,et al.  Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research , 2004 .

[25]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[26]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[27]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .

[28]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[29]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[30]  C. Helfferich,et al.  Die Qualität qualitativer Daten , 2004 .

[31]  Sandy Behrens,et al.  Shadow systems: the good, the bad and the ugly , 2009, CACM.

[32]  Nikos Tsikriktsis,et al.  The Impact of Process Variation on Customer Dissatisfaction: Evidence from the U.S. Domestic Airline Industry , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[33]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Looking Forward: Toward an Understanding of the Nature and Definition of IT Acceptance , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .