Enhanced identification and biological validation of differential gene expression via Illumina whole-genome expression arrays through the use of the model-based background correction methodology

Despite the tremendous growth of microarray usage in scientific studies, there is a lack of standards for background correction methodologies, especially in single-color microarray platforms. Traditional background subtraction methods often generate negative signals and thus cause large amounts of data loss. Hence, some researchers prefer to avoid background corrections, which typically result in the underestimation of differential expression. Here, by utilizing nonspecific negative control features integrated into Illumina whole genome expression arrays, we have developed a method of model-based background correction for BeadArrays (MBCB). We compared the MBCB with a method adapted from the Affymetrix robust multi-array analysis algorithm and with no background subtraction, using a mouse acute myeloid leukemia (AML) dataset. We demonstrated that differential expression ratios obtained by using the MBCB had the best correlation with quantitative RT–PCR. MBCB also achieved better sensitivity in detecting differentially expressed genes with biological significance. For example, we demonstrated that the differential regulation of Tnfr2, Ikk and NF-kappaB, the death receptor pathway, in the AML samples, could only be detected by using data after MBCB implementation. We conclude that MBCB is a robust background correction method that will lead to more precise determination of gene expression and better biological interpretation of Illumina BeadArray data.

[1]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[2]  Gordon K. Smyth,et al.  A comparison of background correction methods for two-colour microarrays , 2007, Bioinform..

[3]  C. Choi,et al.  Balance of NF-kappaB and p38 MAPK is a determinant of radiosensitivity of the AML-2 and its doxorubicin-resistant cell lines. , 2007, Leukemia research.

[4]  P. Lagadec,et al.  AS602868, a dual inhibitor of IKK2 and FLT3 to target AML cells , 2007, Leukemia.

[5]  G. Kroemer,et al.  NF-kappaB inhibition sensitizes to starvation-induced cell death in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. , 2007, Oncogene.

[6]  L. Larocca,et al.  Reduced BRCA1 expression due to promoter hypermethylation in therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  Zhongxue Chen,et al.  Parameter Estimation for the Exponential-Normal Convolution Model for Background Correction of Affymetrix GeneChip Data , 2006, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[8]  Stephen C. Harris,et al.  Rat toxicogenomic study reveals analytical consistency across microarray platforms , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Leming Shi,et al.  Using RNA sample titrations to assess microarray platform performance and normalization techniques , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Weida Tong,et al.  Evaluation of external RNA controls for the assessment of microarray performance , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  P. Collins,et al.  Performance comparison of one-color and two-color platforms within the Microarray Quality Control (MAQC) project , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Catalin C. Barbacioru,et al.  Evaluation of DNA microarray results with quantitative gene expression platforms , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  F. Mikhail,et al.  Normal and transforming functions of RUNX1: A perspective , 2006, Journal of cellular physiology.

[14]  M. Karin Nuclear factor-kappaB in cancer development and progression. , 2006, Nature.

[15]  Maqc Consortium The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  U. Lehmann,et al.  Absence of p21CIP1, p27KIP1 and p57KIP2 methylation in MDS and AML , 2005 .

[17]  Michael G. Barnes,et al.  Experimental comparison and cross-validation of the Affymetrix and Illumina gene expression analysis platforms , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  B. Calabretta,et al.  Enhanced Proliferative Potential of Hematopoietic Cells Expressing Degradation-resistant c-Myb Mutants* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  In vivo antitumor activity of the NF-kappaB inhibitor dehydroxymethylepoxyquinomicin in a mouse model of adult T-cell leukemia. , 2005, Carcinogenesis.

[20]  G. Christophides,et al.  Functional Genomic Analysis of Midgut Epithelial Responses in Anopheles during Plasmodium Invasion , 2005, Current Biology.

[21]  Karen Blyth,et al.  The runx genes: gain or loss of function in cancer , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[22]  A. Brix Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[23]  U. Lehmann,et al.  Absence of p21(CIP 1), p27(KIP 1) and p 57(KIP 2) methylation in MDS and AML. , 2005, Leukemia research.

[24]  Philippe Rigault,et al.  A novel, high-performance random array platform for quantitative gene expression profiling. , 2004, Genome research.

[25]  D. MacEwan,et al.  Switching leukemia cell phenotype between life and death. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Monika Milewski,et al.  Decoding randomly ordered DNA arrays. , 2004, Genome research.

[27]  K. Björk,et al.  A cluster of differentially expressed signal transduction genes identified by microarray analysis in a rat genetic model of alcoholism , 2004, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[28]  L. Qin,et al.  Empirical evaluation of data transformations and ranking statistics for microarray analysis. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  Rafael A Irizarry,et al.  Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[30]  Ken W. Y. Cho,et al.  Microarray optimizations: increasing spot accuracy and automated identification of true microarray signals. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  S. Sealfon,et al.  Accuracy and calibration of commercial oligonucleotide and custom cDNA microarrays. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  A. Multani,et al.  Disruption of the NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) gene in mice causes myelogenous hyperplasia. , 2002, Cancer research.

[33]  Charles L. Kooperberg,et al.  Improved Background Correction for Spotted DNA Microarrays , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[34]  Cheng Li,et al.  Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: model validation, design issues and standard error application , 2001, Genome Biology.

[35]  C. Li,et al.  Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Processing and quality control of DNA array hybridization data , 2000, Bioinform..