The reference problem and mapping of coherence: A simulation study

SummaryFour techniques are applied to record EEG signals: bipolar recording, referential recording, common average reference recording and source derivation. For the interpretation of EEG parameter maps knowledge of the properties of the applied recording technique is essential. Bipolar recordings are not discussed in this paper. The application of reference and common average reference recording has the disadvantage of an unknown reference potential. This disadvantage is much larger with the use of source derivation because every electrode signal has its particular reference signal. This must be taken into consideration when coherence estimations are made. With actual EEG records the influence of the reference cannot be determined unambiguously. However, simulation studies enable some essential conclusions. In this paper by means of autoregressive processes EEG signals with given power and coherence properties were simulated and different recording situations using the same data set were reconstructed. The essential result is that computation and mapping of coherences yield the most reliable results when reference recording is used. However, measures to ensure a low reference signal must be taken.

[1]  B. Sklar,et al.  An EEG Experiment Aimed Toward Identifying Dyslexic Children , 1972, Nature.

[2]  F. Offner,et al.  The EEG as potential mapping: the value of the average monopolar reference. , 1950, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  J G Beaumont,et al.  Asymmetry in EEG alpha coherence and power: effects of task and sex. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  H. Petsche,et al.  Probability mapping: Power and coherence analyses of cognitive processes , 2005, Brain Topography.

[5]  P. Nunez.  Estimation of large scale neocortical source activity with EEG surface Laplacians , 2005, Brain Topography.

[6]  M. D. Rugg,et al.  The specificity of intrahemispheric EEG alpha coherence asymmetry related to psychological task , 1979, Biological Psychology.

[7]  J. Beaumont,et al.  A critical review of EEG coherence studies of hemisphere function. , 1984, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[8]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  3 – Spatial Analysis of EEG and Evoked Potential Data , 1986 .

[9]  Alan S. Gevins,et al.  Analysis of the Electromagnetic Signals of the Human Brain: Milestones, Obstacles, and Goals , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  W. Walter,et al.  COMPARISON OF SUBCORTICAL, CORTICAL AND SCALP ACTIVITY USING CHRONICALLY INDWELLING ELECTRODES IN MAN. , 1965, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  H Suzuki,et al.  Transverse relationships of the alpha rhythm on the scalp. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[13]  D Lehmann,et al.  Averaging of spectral power and phase via vector diagram best fits without reference electrode or reference channel. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  G Fein,et al.  Common reference coherence data are confounded by power and phase effects. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  T. Gasser,et al.  Development of the EEG of school-age children and adolescents. II. Topography. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  5 – Event-Related Desynchronization Mapping: Visualization of Cortical Activation Patterns , 1986 .

[17]  G C Galbraith,et al.  EEG correlates of visual-motor practice in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  D GOLDMAN,et al.  The clinical use of the "average" reference electrode in monopolar recording. , 1950, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  B. Hjorth.  An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Tucker,et al.  Functional connections among cortical regions: topography of EEG coherence. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  R. Thatcher,et al.  Human cerebral hemispheres develop at different rates and ages. , 1987, Science.

[22]  R. Thatcher,et al.  Cortico-cortical associations and EEG coherence: a two-compartmental model. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  D M Tucker,et al.  Regional changes in EEG power and coherence during cognition: intensive study of two individuals. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  M R Nuwer,et al.  Quantitative EEG: I. Techniques and Problems of Frequency Analysis and Topographic Mapping , 1988, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[25]  J C Shaw,et al.  The EEG as a Measure of Cerebral Functional Organization , 1977, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[26]  T. Gasser,et al.  Development of the EEG of school-age children and adolescents. I. Analysis of band power. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  J. C. Shaw,et al.  Eeg coherence analysis and field dependence , 1982, Biological Psychology.

[28]  D. G. Watts,et al.  Spectral analysis and its applications , 1968 .

[29]  A S Gevins,et al.  Human neuroelectric patterns predict performance accuracy. , 1987, Science.