DETERMINANTS OF STRATEGIC PLANNING SYSTEMS IN LARGE ORGANIZATIONS: A CONTINGENCY APPROACH*

This study investigates the relationship among four design parameters of planning systems and five different firm and environmental characteristics. The impact of this multivariate relationship on organizational effectiveness is then examined using a sample of 115 large manufacturing firms. The findings show general support for the proposition that, in order to be effective, a strategic planning system should be designed in such a way that the specific situational setting of the firm is reflected in the design. The analysis also indicates that firms adopt a more flexible planning system - captured here by two key variables, planning horizon, and frequency of plan reviews - as the level of environmental complexity increases. Implications for future research are discussed.

[1]  Rudi K. F. Bresser,et al.  Dysfunctional Effects of Formal Planning: Two Theoretical Explanations. , 1983 .

[2]  D. Norburn,et al.  Planning for Existing Markets: Perceptions of Executives and Financial Performance , 1975 .

[3]  Raymond Radosevich,et al.  Does planning pay? The effect of planning on success of acquisitions in American firms , 1970 .

[4]  J. Armstrong,et al.  The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Review of empirical research , 1982 .

[5]  Michael B. McCaskey,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Planning: Planning with Goals and Planning Without Goals , 1974 .

[6]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[7]  G. Steiner,et al.  Pitfalls in multi-national long-range planning , 1975 .

[8]  Ronald J. Kudla.  The Effects of Strategic Planning on Common Stock Returns , 1980 .

[9]  Robert J. House,et al.  Where long-range planning pays off Findings of a survey of formal, informal planners , 1970 .

[10]  Mansour Javidan,et al.  Research note and communication. The impact of environmental uncertainty on long‐range planning practices of the U.S. savings and loan industry , 1984 .

[11]  R. LaForge,et al.  The Impact of Comprehensive Planning on Financial Performance , 1979 .

[12]  Milton Leontiades,et al.  Planning perceptions and planning results , 1980 .

[13]  William M. Lindsay,et al.  Impact of the Organization Environment on the Long-Range Planning Process: A Contingency View , 1980 .

[14]  J. Fredrickson.  The Comprehensiveness of Strategic Decision Processes: Extension, Observations, Future Directions , 1984 .

[15]  Peter M. Grinyer,et al.  How planning works in practice— A survey of 48 U.K. companies , 1980 .

[16]  David M. Herold,et al.  Long-Range Planning And Organizational Performance: A Cross-Valuation Study , 1972 .

[17]  M. Yasai-Ardekani,et al.  Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: Findings in 48 U.K. companies , 1986 .

[18]  Ingolf Bamberger,et al.  Organization for long range planning—A survey of German companies , 1979 .

[19]  J. Child.  Predicting and Understanding Organization Structure. , 1973 .