Pushing the limits: From lanekeeping to autonomous racing

Abstract The success of Electronic Stability Control (ESC) has demonstrated the potential life-saving benefits of vehicle control systems. Lanekeeping presents an obvious next step in vehicle control, but the performance of such systems must be guaranteed before lanekeeping can be viewed as a safety feature. This paper demonstrates that simple lookahead control schemes for lanekeeping are provably robust even at the limits of tire adhesion. By responding to the heading error relative to the desired path, these schemes provide the countersteer behavior necessary to compensate for rear tire saturation and stabilize the vehicle. Using a Lyapunov-based analysis, vehicle stability can be proven even with a highly saturated tire. Taking this a step further by developing a desired path based on the racing line, this lookahead controller can be coupled with longitudinal control based on path position and wheel slip to create an autonomous racecar. The performance of this algorithm shows the potential for lanekeeping control that can truly assist even the best drivers.

[1]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Toward Autonomous Collision Avoidance by Steering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Efstathios Velenis,et al.  Optimality Properties and Driver Input Parameterization for Trail-braking Cornering , 2008, Eur. J. Control.

[3]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory , 1994 .

[4]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Video-based lane estimation and tracking for driver assistance: survey, system, and evaluation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  J. Christian Gerdes,et al.  Estimation of Tire Slip Angle and Friction Limits Using Steering Torque , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[6]  Robert E. Benton,et al.  A static-output-feedback design procedure for robust emergency lateral control of a highway vehicle , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[7]  J. Christian Gerdes,et al.  Lyapunov Based Performance Guarantees for the Potential Field Lane-keeping Assistance System , 2006 .

[8]  Joshua P. Switkes,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF THE POTENTIAL FIELD LANEKEEPING SYSTEM , 2004 .

[9]  Max Donath,et al.  Sensor-based virtual bumpers for collision avoidance: configuration issues , 1995, Other Conferences.

[10]  Dirk M. Reichardt,et al.  Collision avoidance in dynamic environments applied to autonomous vehicle guidance on the motorway , 1994, Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '94 Symposium.

[11]  Kirstin L. R. Talvala,et al.  Lanekeeping at the Limits of Handling: Stability via Lyapunov Functions and a Comparison With Stability Control , 2008 .

[12]  HE Tseng,et al.  Evasive manoeuvres with a steering robot , 2005 .

[13]  Hidehisa Yoshida,et al.  Cooperative Steering Characteristics of Driver and Lane-Keeping Assistance System , 2003 .

[14]  Saïd Mammar,et al.  Driver Steering Assistance for Lane-Departure Avoidance Based on Hybrid Automata and Composite Lyapunov Function , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[15]  P. Gahinet,et al.  Affine parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions and real parametric uncertainty , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[16]  Thomas Sattel,et al.  Towards vehicle trajectory planning for collision avoidance based on elastic bands , 2007 .

[17]  William F. Milliken,et al.  Race Car Vehicle Dynamics , 1994 .

[18]  J. Christian Gerdes,et al.  Autonomous Cornering at the Limits: Maximizing a “g-g” Diagram by Using Feedforward Trail-Braking and Throttle-on-Exit , 2010 .