Improvement of Occupational Noise‐induced Temporary Threshold Shift by Active Noise Control Earmuff and Bone Conduction Microphone

Improvement of Occupational Noise‐ induced Temporary Threshold Shift by Active Noise Control Earmuff and Bone Conduction Microphone: Seichi Horie. Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Science, University of Occupational and Environmental Health—A newly devised earmuff that utilizes an active noise control system and a bone‐ conduction microphone was examined in an actual working environment where workers are required to communicate under noisy conditions. Thirteen experienced male workers aged 26 to 46 (mean ± SD; 37.5 ± 5.8) engaged in manufacturing steel pipes participated in the study. For 4 h working in a noisy environment (92 to 103 dBA), they used the conventional device (an earphone on one ear and an earplug in the other, and an ordinary microphone) or the new device. After wearing the new device, the temporary threshold shift (TTS) at 4 kHz was lowered (p<0.045, Wilcoxon's sign rank test) and the number of workers who had TTS was reduced in all frequencies examined (p<0.001, two‐way repeated‐measures ANOVA). Many workers evaluated the new device superior to the conventional one especially in its “clearness of voice,” but they did not give the new device a good overall rating mainly because of its heaviness. Although the new device needs improvement, it appears promising as a hearing protector.

[1]  R T Gordon,et al.  Active noise control: a review of the field. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[2]  W. D. Ward,et al.  Damage risk criteria and noise-induced hearing loss. , 1961, Archives of otolaryngology.

[3]  K. D. Kryter Effects of Ear Protective Devices on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise , 1946 .

[4]  Temporary threshold shifts produced by wideband noise. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Axelsson,et al.  Is there a relationship between hypercholesterolaemia and noise-induced hearing loss? , 1985, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[6]  Temporary threshold shift and otoacoustic emissions after industrial noise exposure. , 1995, Scandinavian audiology.

[7]  P. D. di Prampero,et al.  Temporary threshold shift induced by physical exercise. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.

[8]  Ml Munjal,et al.  An analytical, one‐dimensional, standing‐wave model of a linear active noise control system in a duct , 1988 .

[9]  J. Irwin,et al.  Some audiological aspects of diabetes mellitus , 1978, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[10]  A S Wagstaff,et al.  Effects of active noise reduction on noise levels at the tympanic membrane. , 1998, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[11]  K. Gerhardt,et al.  Relationship between outer ear resonance and permanent noise-induced hearing loss. , 1994, American journal of otolaryngology.

[12]  J Zera,et al.  Comparison between subjective and objective measures of active hearing protector and communication headset attenuation. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Mervyn D. G. Randall,et al.  Hearing protectors. , 1975, Consumer reports.

[14]  F. Lindgren,et al.  The influence of eye colour on susceptibility to TTS in humans. , 1991, British journal of audiology.

[15]  E. Talbott,et al.  Race/ethnicity differences in the prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in a group of metal fabricating workers. , 1998, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[16]  P W Alberti,et al.  The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice. , 1979, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[17]  L. Royster,et al.  An evaluation of the effectiveness of three hearing protection devices at an industrial facility with a TWA of 107 dB. , 1984, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Monique Boymans,et al.  Field Trials Using a Digital Hearing Aid with Active Noise Reduction and Dual-Microphone Directionality: Estudios de campo utilizando un audifono digital con reduccion activa del ruido y micrófono de direccionalidad dual , 2000, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[19]  A. Glorig,et al.  Noise‐Induced Permanent Threshold Shift at 2000 cps and 4000 cps , 1961 .

[20]  J Pekkarinen,et al.  Noise, impulse noise, and other physical factors: combined effects on hearing. , 1995, Occupational medicine.

[21]  W. D. Ward Endogenous factors related to susceptibility to damage from noise. , 1995, Occupational medicine.

[22]  Daniel W. Gower,et al.  Speech Intelligibility and Protective Effectiveness of Selected Active Noise Reduction and Conventional Communications Headsets , 1994, Human factors.

[23]  A. Balakrishnan,et al.  The Noise‐Cancelling Headset—An Active Ear Defender , 1955 .

[24]  Akiyoshi Ito,et al.  Real Ear Attenuation of Earplugs and Their Efficiency in Noise-exposed Workers , 1994 .

[25]  Aram Glorig,et al.  Temporary Threshold Shift from Octave‐Band Noise: Applications to Damage‐Risk Criteria , 1959 .

[26]  A. Siegelaub,et al.  Hearing loss in adults: relation to age, sex, exposure to loud noise, and cigarette smoking. , 1974, Archives of environmental health.

[27]  V Sallustio,et al.  Development of resistance to noise. , 1998, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[28]  J Sataloff,et al.  Occupational hearing loss , 1987 .

[29]  K. D. Kryter,et al.  Hazardous exposure to intermittent and steady-state noise. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  H. Dengerink,et al.  The interaction of smoking and noise on temporary threshold shifts. , 1992, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[31]  L H Royster,et al.  Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[32]  W Melnick,et al.  Human temporary threshold shift (TTS) and damage risk. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.