Sensory and rapid instrumental methods as a combined tool for quality control of cooked ham

In this preliminary investigation, different commercial categories of Italian cooked pork hams have been characterized using an integrated approach based on both sensory and fast instrumental measurements. For these purposes, Italian products belonging to different categories (cooked ham, “selected” cooked ham and “high quality” cooked ham) were evaluated by sensory descriptive analysis and by the application of rapid tools such as image analysis by an “electronic eye” and texture analyzer. The panel of trained assessors identified and evaluated 10 sensory descriptors able to define the quality of the products. Statistical analysis highlighted that sensory characteristics related to appearance and texture were the most significant in discriminating samples belonged to the highest (high quality cooked hams) and the lowest (cooked hams) quality of the product whereas the selected cooked hams, showed intermediate characteristics. In particular, high quality samples were characterized, above all, by the highest intensity of pink intensity, typical appearance and cohesiveness, and, at the same time, by the lowest intensity of juiciness; standard cooked ham samples showed the lowest intensity of all visual attributes and the highest value of juiciness, whereas the intermediate category (selected cooked ham) was not discriminated from the other. Also physical-rheological parameters measured by electronic eye and texture analyzer were effective in classifying samples. In particular, the PLS model built with data obtained from the electronic eye showed a satisfactory performance in terms of prediction of the pink intensity and presence of fat attributes evaluated during the sensory visual phase. This study can be considered a first application of this combined approach that could represent a suitable and fast method to verify if the meat product purchased by consumer match its description in terms of compliance with the claimed quality.

[1]  T. Kenny,et al.  Effect of rapid and conventional cooling methods on the quality of cooked ham joints. , 2000, Meat science.

[2]  A. Franchini,et al.  Technological characteristics of turkey breast rolls produced with fresh or thawed meat and different formulations , 2009 .

[3]  Da-Wen Sun,et al.  An overview on principle, techniques and application of hyperspectral imaging with special reference to ham quality evaluation and control , 2014 .

[4]  R. Deliza,et al.  Consumer Sensory Characterization of Cooked Ham Using the Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Methodology , 2015, Food Engineering Reviews.

[5]  M. Aaslyng.  Quality indicators for raw meat , 2002 .

[6]  Conor M. Delahunty,et al.  Sensory characterisation of cooked hams by untrained consumers using free-choice profiling , 1997 .

[7]  J. Kerry,et al.  Response surface methodology analysis of rice starch and fructo-oligosaccharides as substitutes for phosphate and dextrose in whole muscle cooked hams , 2015 .

[8]  Malcolm C. Bourne,et al.  Texture profile analysis , 1978 .

[9]  Ripening of salami: assessment of colour and aspect evolution using image analysis and multivariate image analysis. , 2015, Meat science.

[10]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[11]  E. Dransfield,et al.  Sensory characteristics of ham and their relationships with composition, visco-elasticity and strength , 2007 .

[12]  Ernestina Casiraghi,et al.  Cooked ham classification on the basis of brine injection level and pork breeding country , 2007 .

[13]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling , 2014 .

[14]  J. Salmerón,et al.  Texture profile analysis of meat products treated with commercial liquid smoke flavourings , 2004 .

[15]  G. Civille,et al.  Descriptive Analysis Techniques , 2015 .

[16]  José M. Barat,et al.  Control of ham salting by using image segmentation , 2008 .

[17]  V. Moretti,et al.  DIFFERENTIATION OF CURED COOKED HAMS BY PHYSICO‐CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND CHEMOMETRICS , 2009 .

[18]  E. King,et al.  Classical descriptive analysis , 2014 .

[19]  J. Kerry,et al.  Rice starch and fructo-oligosaccharides as substitutes for phosphate and dextrose in whole muscle cooked hams: Sensory analysis and consumer preferences , 2016 .

[20]  Fernando Mendoza,et al.  Classification of pre-sliced pork and Turkey ham qualities based on image colour and textural features and their relationships with consumer responses. , 2010, Meat science.

[21]  Paul Allen,et al.  Prediction of moisture, color and pH in cooked, pre-sliced turkey hams by NIR hyperspectral imaging system , 2013 .

[22]  I. Ferreira,et al.  Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Cooked Ham: Effect of Tumbling Time and Modifications during Storage , 2015 .

[23]  V. Tomović,et al.  Sensory, physical and chemical characteristics of cooked ham manufactured from rapidly chilled and earlier deboned M. semimembranosus. , 2013, Meat science.

[24]  H. Buchtová,et al.  Chemical, instrumental and sensory characteristics of cooked pork ham. , 2007, Meat science.

[25]  G. Heinz,et al.  Meat processing technology for small to medium scale producers , 2007 .

[26]  Gamal ElMasry,et al.  Near-infrared hyperspectral imaging for predicting colour, pH and tenderness of fresh beef , 2012 .

[27]  Da-Wen Sun,et al.  Improving quality inspection of food products by computer vision: a review , 2004 .