Effects of Silk Maturity and Pollination on Infection of Maize Ears by Ustilago maydis.

Host resistance is the most efficient method of controlling common smut of maize (Zea mays), caused by Ustilago maydis. Precise timing of ear inoculations with U. maydis relative to silk maturity and pollination may improve the ability to screen maize germ plasm for resistance. The objectives of this study were to determine the length of time maize kernels can be infected by U. maydis through silks, and to examine the effects of pollination on infection through silks. Two field studies were done in 1995, 1996, and 1997 at the University of Illinois South Farms. In the date-of-inoculation study, ears were inoculated at 2- to 3-day intervals from early silk emergence until 16 days after silk emergence. In the date-of-planting study, hybrids were planted on four dates and ears were inoculated on the same day for all planting dates. In each study, ear shoots were covered with shoot bags prior to silk emergence to prevent pollination, or ear shoots were left uncovered to allow silks to be pollinated normally. Maize ears were susceptible to infection by U. maydis from silk emergence until 8 to 14 days after silk emergence. During this period of susceptibility, incidence of ears with galls decreased as silks aged. Incidence of ears with galls on plants inoculated 7 days apart differed by as much as 70%. The period that maize ears were susceptible to infection by U. maydis was shorter and incidence of ears with galls decreased more rapidly when silks were exposed to pollen than when silks were not exposed. The silk channel method of inoculating for common smut does not appear to be practical for large-scale evaluations of numerous lines. The method is practical for evaluating a limited number of lines or for inducing ear galls for commercial production of huitlacoche (smut galls eaten at an immature stage).

[1]  Du Toit,et al.  Field Infection Studies on Common Smut of Sweet Corn , 1998 .

[2]  M. Kerns,et al.  Evaluation of a silk-inoculation technique to differentiate reactions of sweet corn hybrids to common smut , 1995 .

[3]  O. Paredes-López,et al.  Yield and Quality of Huitlacoche on Sweet Corn Inoculated with Ustilago maydis , 1993 .

[4]  K. Snetselaar,et al.  Infection of maize stigmas by Ustilago maydis: light and electron microscopy , 1993 .

[5]  D. Mather,et al.  Effect of silk age on resistance of maize to Fusarium graminearum , 1992 .

[6]  S. Mccarter,et al.  Evaluation of inoculation methods for inducing common smut on corn ears , 1992 .

[7]  W. Colón,et al.  EFFECTS OF ABA AND IRRADIANCE LEVEL ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF STAGE III ARONlA ARBUTIFOLIA MICROCUTTINGS , 1991 .

[8]  J. Juvik,et al.  Relationships among carbohydrate content of kernels, condition of silks after pollination, and the response of sweet corn inbred lines to infection of kernels by Fusarium moniliforme , 1990 .

[9]  H. D. Wells,et al.  Effects of inoculation and pollination on smut development in near-isogenic lines of pearl millet , 1987 .

[10]  P. Mantle,et al.  Postpollination stigmatic constriction, the basis of ergot resistance in selected lines of pearl millet. , 1986 .

[11]  J. Heslop-Harrison,et al.  THE POLLEN‐STIGMA INTERACTION IN THE GRASSES. 7. POLLEN‐TUBE GUIDANCE AND THE REGULATION OF TUBE NUMBER IN ZEA MAYS L. , 1985 .

[12]  J. Heslop-Harrison,et al.  THE POLLEN‐STIGMA INTERACTION IN THE GRASSES. 5. TISSUE ORGANISATION AND CYTOCHEMISTRY OF THE STIGMA (“SILK”) OF ZEA MAYS L. , 1984 .

[13]  G. Payne,et al.  Preharvest infection of corn silks and kernels by Aspergillus flavus. , 1984 .

[14]  R. B. Hunter,et al.  A technique for screening maize (Zea mays L.) for resistance to ear mold incited by Gibberella zeae (Schw.) Petch. , 1980 .

[15]  James H. Torrie,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach (2nd ed) , 1980 .

[16]  Malcolm C. Shurtleff,et al.  Compendium of corn diseases , 1980 .

[17]  R. Williams,et al.  Pollination effects on pearl millet ergot , 1980 .

[18]  L. Busch,et al.  Stimulation of Fusarium graminearum by maize pollen , 1978 .

[19]  J. M. Walter Factors affecting the development of corn smut, ustilago zeae (Beckm.) Unger , 1933 .

[20]  Gustav A. Platz Some factors influencing the pathogenicity of Ustilago zeae (Beckm) Unger , 1928 .