An Evaluation of the Potential for Fuzzy Classification of Multispect ral Data Using Artificial Neural Networks

Fuzzy classification, or pixel unmixing, is the estimation of the proportion of the cover types from the composite spectrum of a mixed pixel. In this paper, we evaluate how the separation between class means, the covariance matrix of each class, and the relative location of the class means in the spectral space limit the fuzzy representation of mixtures. The influence of these factors is illustrated with a fuzzy classification using a back-propaga tion artificial neural net. Experiments using simulated data indicate that a fuzzy classification with an average error of less than 10 percent requires a Bhattacharyya Distance between classes of at least 9. The error in the fuzzy representation using a neural net also varies as the proportions of the classes changes, with a peak error when one class comprises approximately 0.20 to 0.25 of the mixed pixel. Back-propagation neural networks are not necessarily good at spectral unmixing. The backpropagation neural network produces spectral-space partitions between the classes that are generally steep, and that are not necessarily midway between the classes. The partitions tend to be simple, and somewhat linear. In addition, the output on nodes does not have to sum to 1.0, which may result in situations where high values are predicted for two classes simultaneously. Two methods of improving neural network behavior for fuzzy classification include use of a compound linear-sigmoid activation function, and training using synthetic mixed pixels.

[1]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence , 1974, IFIP Congress.

[2]  Philip H. Swain,et al.  Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[4]  R. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[5]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[6]  Scott E. Decatur,et al.  Application of neural networks to terrain classification , 1989, International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[7]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Neural Network Approaches Versus Statistical Methods in Classification of Multisource Remote Sensing Data , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[8]  J. Key,et al.  Classification of merged AVHRR and SMMR Arctic data with neural networks , 1989 .

[9]  John B. Adams,et al.  Simple Models For Complex Natural Surfaces: A Strategy For The Hyperspectral Era Of Remote Sensing , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[10]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Vegetation in deserts. I - A regional measure of abundance from multispectral images. II - Environmental influences on regional abundance , 1990 .

[11]  Fangju Wang,et al.  Fuzzy supervised classification of remote sensing images , 1990 .

[12]  Bruce W. Suter,et al.  The multilayer perceptron as an approximation to a Bayes optimal discriminant function , 1990, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[13]  George F. Hepner,et al.  Artificial neural network classification using a minimal training set - Comparison to conventional supervised classification , 1990 .

[14]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  A neural network approach to cloud classification , 1990 .

[15]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Neural networks and fuzzy systems: a dynamical systems approach to machine intelligence , 1991 .

[16]  Philip H. Swain,et al.  Improving classification of crop residues using digital land ownership data and Landsat TM imagery , 1991 .

[17]  Robert J. Schalkoff,et al.  Pattern recognition - statistical, structural and neural approaches , 1991 .

[18]  P. D. Heermann,et al.  Classification of multispectral remote sensing data using a back-propagation neural network , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Fuzzy ARTMAP: A neural network architecture for incremental supervised learning of analog multidimensional maps , 1992, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[20]  Horst Bischof,et al.  Multispectral classification of Landsat-images using neural networks , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  N. Campbell,et al.  Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum-likelihood classification , 1992 .

[22]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Fuzzy models—What are they, and why? [Editorial] , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[23]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Analyzing high-dimensional multispectral data , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[24]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Rule-based geobotanical classification of topographic, aeromagnetic, and remotely sensed vegetation community data , 1994 .

[25]  G. Foody,et al.  Sub-pixel land cover composition estimation using a linear mixture model and fuzzy membership functions , 1994 .

[26]  F. Maselli,et al.  Use of probability entropy for the estimation and graphical representation of the accuracy of maximum likelihood classifications , 1994 .

[27]  J. Boardman,et al.  Geometric mixture analysis of imaging spectrometry data , 1994, Proceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[28]  W. B. Yates,et al.  Classification of remotely sensed data by an artificial neural network: issues related to training data characteristics , 1995 .

[29]  G. M. Foody,et al.  Relating the land-cover composition of mixed pixels to artificial neural network classification outpout , 1996 .

[30]  Brian Curtiss,et al.  A method for manual endmember selection and spectral unmixing , 1996 .

[31]  T. W. Ray,et al.  Nonlinear Spectral Mixing in Desert Vegetation , 1996 .