Controlling structural failure modes during an impact in the presence of uncertainties

A methodology to enforce a given structural dynamic behavior during an impact while accounting for uncertainty is presented. The approach is based on locating structural fuses that weaken the structure locally and help enforce a deformation mode. The problem of enforcing the crushing of a tube impacting a rigid wall is chosen. In order to find the positions of the fuses, the method identifies distinct structural dynamic behaviors using designs of experiments and clustering techniques. The changes in behavior are studied with respect to variations of the fuse positions and random parameters, such as the thickness. Based on the probabilistic distributions, a measure of the likelihood of occurrence of global buckling is defined. The positions of the fuses are defined using an optimization problem in terms of the likelihood of global buckling and the amount of absorbed energy in the tube. A first formulation of the problem considers variability in the tube’s thickness only. A second formulation also accounts for uncertainties in the positions of the fuses.

[1]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Design of Computer Experiments for Improving an Impact Test Simulation , 2000 .

[2]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[3]  Christopher R. Houck,et al.  A Genetic Algorithm for Function Optimization: A Matlab Implementation , 2001 .

[4]  Liquan Mei,et al.  Reasons for Scatter in Crash Simulation Results , 2003 .

[5]  Satchi Venkataraman,et al.  Incorporating Model Uncertainties and Variability in Optimization of Laminates for Predictable Failure , 2006 .

[6]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis , 2003, ICTAI.

[7]  Nielen Stander,et al.  Stochastic analysis of highly non‐linear structures , 2006 .

[8]  G. Nurick,et al.  The Effect Of Induced Imperfections On TheFormation Of The First Lobe Of SymmetricProgressive Buckling Of Thin- Walled SquareTubes , 1970 .

[9]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact , 2004 .

[10]  S. J. Hosseinipour,et al.  Experimental studies on thin-walled grooved tubes under axial compression , 2004 .

[11]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design (Haldar, Mahadevan) , 1999 .

[12]  R. Stocki,et al.  Stochastic simulation for crashworthiness , 2004 .

[13]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Challenge Problems : Uncertainty in System Response Given Uncertain Parameters ( DRAFT : November 29 , 2001 ) , 2001 .

[14]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization , 2007 .

[15]  Nielen Stander,et al.  Optimization of nonlinear dynamical problems using successive linear approximations , 2000 .

[16]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Computability in non‐linear solid mechanics , 2001 .

[17]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation , 2001, DAC 2001.

[18]  Samy Missoum,et al.  Design Space Decomposition using Support Vector Machines for Reliability-based Design Optimization , 2006 .

[19]  Shang-Liang Chen,et al.  Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks , 1991, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[20]  Julius T. Tou,et al.  Pattern Recognition Principles , 1974 .

[21]  Hasan Kurtaran,et al.  Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximations , 2002 .