Digital literacy and effective learning in a blended learning environment

Leveraging the capabilities of the web, which has become hugely popular among university students since its inception in the 90s, blended learning has been promoted as an alternative to classroom learning. A hybrid of classroom learning and online learning, blended learning offers flexibility in the way students learn – when, what, where, and how to learn. The easy availability of mobile devices (e.g. smartphones, tablets, etc.), coupled with web-based services (e.g. digital library, learning management systems, etc.), has further fuelled blended learning. Universities see online learning as complementary to classroom learning so as to give students a better learning experience, and students like the learning flexibility. As blended learning expects students to know how to use digital technology to access the web, to search for and to use information from different sources both online and offline, as well as to be an independent learner, it seems reasonable to presume that to be an effective learner in a blended learning environment, students need to have a certain level of digital literacy. Thus, there remains a question: Do students require digital literacy to be effective in learning in a blended learning environment? Answering this question helps universities to understand if high digital literacy is a prerequisite to more effective learning in a blended learning environment. If it is, universities can provide students with workshops to help raise digital literacy among them. Following a quantitative approach, this study conducted an online questionnaire survey to answer the question by examining the relationships between four digital literacy constructs; i.e. underpinnings, background knowledge, central competencies, and attitudes and perspectives; as conceptualised by David Bawden in his 2008 book chapter entitled "Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy," and effective learning. This study developed a 5-item scale to operationalise each of the four digital literacy constructs and, using the revised Bloom’s taxonomy as a point of departure, a 6-item scale for the effective learning construct. To collect responses from the students who were taking subjects in a blended learning environment at a local university, the students were invited to fill in an online questionnaire. Responses were then analyzed using partial least squares. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in the four digital literacy constructs being reduced to three. Subsequent confirmatory factor analysis proved that the three digital literacy constructs each had a statistically significant relationship with the effective learning construct.

[1]  B. Bloom Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[2]  Helen Beetham Developing Digital Literacies pre-conference webinar , 2013 .

[3]  D. Bawden Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy , 2008 .

[4]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Enterprise Systems Success: A Measurement Model , 2003, ICIS.

[5]  P. Gilster Digital Literacy , 1997, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[6]  K. Senthamaraikannan,et al.  Identification of Outliers in Medical Diagnostic System Using Data Mining Techniques , 2014 .

[7]  Yu-Liang Ting,et al.  Tapping into students' digital literacy and designing negotiated learning to promote learner autonomy , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[8]  L. S. Pettegrew,et al.  The Health Care Context , 1987 .

[9]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[10]  C. Dziuban,et al.  Blended learning: A dangerous idea? , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[11]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Heather Staker,et al.  Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. , 2012 .

[14]  Wan Ng,et al.  Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[15]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[16]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[17]  Yoram Eshet-Alkalai,et al.  Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era , 2004 .

[18]  Sandra Cohen,et al.  Performance Parameters Interrelations from a Balanced Scorecard Perspective: An Analysis of Greek Companies , 2008 .

[19]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[20]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement : a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research , 1997 .

[21]  David Bawden,et al.  The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[23]  Jeffrey Alan Greene,et al.  Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Social question answering: Analyzing knowledge, cognitive processes and social dimensions of micro-collaborations , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Wendy A. McKenzie,et al.  A blended learning lecture delivery model for large and diverse undergraduate cohorts , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[26]  D. Garrison,et al.  Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: Two case studies , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[27]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Buket Akkoyunlu,et al.  Development of a scale on learners' views on blended learning and its implementation process , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[29]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[30]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Herbert Meyr,et al.  The Implementation Process , 2015 .

[32]  M. Glogowska,et al.  How 'blended' is blended learning?: students' perceptions of issues around the integration of online and face-to-face learning in a Continuing Professional Development (CPD) health care context. , 2011, Nurse education today.

[33]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[34]  J. M. Sierra,et al.  Blended learning applied to the study of Mechanical Couplings in engineering , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Matthew A. Waller,et al.  LATENT VARIABLES IN BUSINESS LOGISTICS RESEARCH: SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION / , 1994 .

[36]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[37]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[38]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[39]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .