Design Analysis and Circuit Topology Optimization for Programmable Magnetic Neurostimulator

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation commonly used to modulate neural activity. Despite three decades of examination, the generation of flexible magnetic pulses is still a challenging technical question. It has been revealed that the characteristics of pulses influence the bio-physiology of neuromodulation. In this study, a second-generation programmable TMS (xTMS) equipment with advanced stimulus shaping is introduced that uses cascaded H-bridge inverters and a phase-shifted pulse-width modulation (PWM). A low-pass RC filter model is used to estimate stimulated neural behavior, which helps to design the magnetic pulse generator, according to neural dynamics. The proposed device can generate highly adjustable magnetic pulses, in terms of waveform, polarity and pattern. We present experimental measurements of different stimuli waveforms, such as monophasic, biphasic and polyphasic shapes with peak coil current and the delivered energy of up to 6 kA and 250 J, respectively. The modular and scalable design idea presented here is a potential solution for generating arbitrary and highly customizable magnetic pulses and transferring repetitive paradigms.

[1]  Timothy Denison,et al.  Programmable Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Modulation Approach for the Generation of Controllable Magnetic Stimuli , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Timothy Denison,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Plasticity Induced by Quadri-Pulse Stimulation , 2021, IEEE Access.

[3]  M. Trivedi,et al.  Identification of psychiatric-disorder subtypes from functional-connectivity patterns in resting-state electroencephalography , 2020, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Mauro Ciappa,et al.  Selected failure mechanisms of modern power modules , 2002, Microelectron. Reliab..

[5]  Alberto Pisoni,et al.  TMS orientation and pulse waveform manipulation activates different neural populations: direct evidence from TMS-EEG , 2018, bioRxiv.

[6]  S. Lisanby,et al.  Pulse width dependence of motor threshold and input–output curve characterized with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  A T Barker,et al.  Magnetic nerve stimulation: the effect of waveform on efficiency, determination of neural membrane time constants and the measurement of stimulator output. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[8]  A T Barker,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Which part of the current waveform causes the stimulation? , 2001, Experimental brain research.

[9]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulator with enhanced circuit topology and pulse shaping , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Daniel J. Rogers,et al.  Paralleling insulated-gate bipolar transistors in the H-bridge structure to reduce current stress , 2021, SN Applied Sciences.

[11]  Hadi Veladi,et al.  Deep-Brain Transcranial Stimulation: A Novel Approach for High 3-D Resolution , 2017, IEEE Access.

[12]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Neuronal Dynamics: From Single Neurons To Networks And Models Of Cognition , 2014 .

[13]  Hadi Veladi,et al.  Measurement of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Resolution in 3-D Spaces , 2018 .

[14]  W. Paulus,et al.  Strength-Duration Relationship in Paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Its Implications for Repetitive TMS , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[15]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Effects of pulse width, waveform and current direction in the cortex: A combined cTMS-EEG study , 2018, Brain Stimulation.