A Statistical Investigation into the Cross-Linguistic Distribution of Mass and Count Nouns: Morphosyntactic and Semantic Perspectives

We collected a database of how 1,434 nouns are used with respect to the mass/count distinction in six languages; additional informants characterized the semantics of the underlying concepts. Results indicate only weak correlations between semantics and syntactic usage. In five out of the six languages, roughly half the nouns in the database are used as pure count nouns in all respects; the other half differ from pure counts over distinct syntactic properties, with fewer nouns differing on more properties, and typically very few at the pure mass end of the spectrum. Such a graded distribution is similar across languages, but syntactic classes do not map onto each other, nor do they reflect, beyond weak correlations, semantic attributes of the concepts. Considerable variability is seen even among speakers of the same language. These findings are in line with the hypothesis that much of the mass/count syntax emerges from language- and even speaker-specific grammaticalization.

[1]  J. Schaeffer,et al.  On the (changing?) status of the mass/count distinction in Hebrew: Evidence from acquisition , 2009 .

[2]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of “Semantic Parameter” , 1998 .

[3]  Godehard Link.  The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .

[4]  Terence Parsons,et al.  Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics , 1990 .

[5]  S. Potter,et al.  Universals of Language , 1966 .

[6]  Susan Rothstein,et al.  The Felicity of Aspectual For-Phrases - Part 1: Homogeneity , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[7]  Susan Rothstein,et al.  Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction , 2010, J. Semant..

[8]  B. MacWhinney.  The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[9]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count , 2005, Cognition.

[10]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  Descriptive Metaphysics, Natural Language Metaphysics, Sapir-Whorf, and All That Stuff: Evidence from the Mass-Count Distinction , 2010 .

[11]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation , 2010, Synthese.

[12]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Why superordinate category terms can be mass nouns , 1985, Cognition.

[13]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Analytical estimates of limited sampling biases in different information measures. , 1996, Network.

[14]  S. Prasada,et al.  Conceiving of entities as objects and as stuff , 2002, Cognition.

[15]  Count Nouns - Mass Nouns, Neat Nouns - Mess Nouns , 2010 .

[16]  Otto Jespersen,et al.  The Philosophy of Grammar , 1924 .

[17]  Brendan S. Gillon,et al.  Towards a common semantics for english count and mass nouns , 1992 .

[18]  Susan Rothstein,et al.  Bare singular noun phrases are mass in Brazilian Portuguese , 2011 .

[19]  Latvijas Universitāte,et al.  The Baltic international yearbook of cognition, logic and communication , 2007 .

[20]  Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm.  Mass and collection , 2004 .

[21]  E. Spelke,et al.  Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms , 1991, Cognition.

[22]  David Barner,et al.  The Interpretation of Functional Heads: Using Comparatives to Explore the Mass/Count Distinction , 2009, J. Semant..

[23]  David Nicolas.  Towards a semantics for mass expressions derived from gradable expressions , 2010 .

[24]  D. Saumier,et al.  Semantic and syntactic aspects of the mass/count distinction: A case study of semantic dementia , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  W. Stolz.  Universals of Language. , 1968 .

[26]  Alice F Healy,et al.  Pairing Words with Syntactic Frames: Syntax, Semantics, and Count-Mass Usage , 2011, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[27]  David Barner,et al.  Mass-Count Distinction , 2011 .