Fairness and social welfare in incentivizing participatory sensing

Participatory sensing has emerged recently as a promising approach to large-scale data collection. However, without incentives for users to regularly contribute good quality data, this method is unlikely to be viable in the long run. In this paper, we link incentive to users' demand for consuming compelling services, as an approach complementary to conventional credit or reputation based approaches. With this demand-based principle, we design two incentive schemes, Incentive with Demand Fairness (IDF) and Iterative Tank Filling (ITF), for maximizing fairness and social welfare, respectively. Our study shows that the IDF scheme is max-min fair and can score close to 1 on the Jain's fairness index, while the ITF scheme maximizes social welfare and achieves a unique Nash equilibrium which is also Pareto and globally optimal. We adopted a game theoretic approach to derive the optimal service demands. Furthermore, to address practical considerations, we use a stochastic programming technique to handle uncertainty that is often encountered in real life situations.

[1]  Peter Marbach,et al.  Cooperation in wireless ad hoc networks: a market-based approach , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[2]  J Figueira,et al.  Stochastic Programming , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  Wolfgang Leiniger,et al.  Games and information: An introduction to game theory: Eric Rasmusen, (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1989) , 1991 .

[4]  Chen-Khong Tham,et al.  Participatory Cyber Physical System in Public Transport Application , 2011, 2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing.

[5]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Incentive provision using intervention , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[6]  David K. Y. Yau,et al.  Incentive and Service Differentiation in P2P Networks: A Game Theoretic Approach , 2006, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[7]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  PEIR, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research , 2009, MobiSys '09.

[8]  Levente Buttyán,et al.  Stimulating Cooperation in Self-Organizing Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2003, Mob. Networks Appl..

[9]  Baik Hoh,et al.  Dynamic pricing incentive for participatory sensing , 2010, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[10]  Daniël Wedema Games And Information An Introduction To Game Theory 3rd Edition , 2011 .

[11]  S. Shenker Fundamental Design Issues for the Future Internet , 1995 .

[12]  Qi He,et al.  SORI: a secure and objective reputation-based incentive scheme for ad-hoc networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[13]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Examining micro-payments for participatory sensing data collections , 2010, UbiComp.

[14]  Raj Jain,et al.  A Quantitative Measure Of Fairness And Discrimination For Resource Allocation In Shared Computer Systems , 1998, ArXiv.

[15]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[16]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Common Sense: participatory urban sensing using a network of handheld air quality monitors , 2009, SenSys '09.

[17]  David Tse,et al.  Fundamentals of Wireless Communication , 2005 .

[18]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Toward Community Sensing , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (ipsn 2008).