Objective Assessment and Design Improvement of a Staring, Sparse Transducer Array by the Spatial Crosstalk Matrix for 3D Photoacoustic Tomography

Accurate reconstruction of 3D photoacoustic (PA) images requires detection of photoacoustic signals from many angles. Several groups have adopted staring ultrasound arrays, but assessment of array performance has been limited. We previously reported on a method to calibrate a 3D PA tomography (PAT) staring array system and analyze system performance using singular value decomposition (SVD). The developed SVD metric, however, was impractical for large system matrices, which are typical of 3D PAT problems. The present study consisted of two main objectives. The first objective aimed to introduce the crosstalk matrix concept to the field of PAT for system design. Figures-of-merit utilized in this study were root mean square error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, mean absolute error, and a three dimensional structural similarity index, which were derived between the normalized spatial crosstalk matrix and the identity matrix. The applicability of this approach for 3D PAT was validated by observing the response of the figures-of-merit in relation to well-understood PAT sampling characteristics (i.e. spatial and temporal sampling rate). The second objective aimed to utilize the figures-of-merit to characterize and improve the performance of a near-spherical staring array design. Transducer arrangement, array radius, and array angular coverage were the design parameters examined. We observed that the performance of a 129-element staring transducer array for 3D PAT could be improved by selection of optimal values of the design parameters. The results suggested that this formulation could be used to objectively characterize 3D PAT system performance and would enable the development of efficient strategies for system design optimization.

[1]  Zhou Wang,et al.  On the Mathematical Properties of the Structural Similarity Index , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Richard Su,et al.  Real-time optoacoustic monitoring and three-dimensional mapping of a human arm vasculature. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[3]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  In situ elasticity modulation with dynamic substrates to direct cell phenotype. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[4]  Daniel Razansky,et al.  Optoacoustic Imaging and Tomography: Reconstruction Approaches and Outstanding Challenges in Image Performance and Quantification , 2013, Sensors.

[5]  Richard Su,et al.  Whole-body three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography system for small animals. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  Edward Hæggström,et al.  An optoacoustic point source for acoustic scale model measurements. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Eldon Ng,et al.  Singular value decomposition analysis of a photoacoustic imaging system and 3D imaging at 0.7 FPS , 2011, Optics express.

[8]  H H Barrett,et al.  Cone-beam tomography with discrete data sets. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Huabei Jiang,et al.  4-D Photoacoustic Tomography , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[10]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  Michael Roumeliotis,et al.  Development and characterization of an omnidirectional photoacoustic point source for calibration of a staring 3D photoacoustic imaging system. , 2009, Optics express.

[12]  Daniel Razansky,et al.  Volumetric Real-Time Tracking of Peripheral Human Vasculature With GPU-Accelerated Three-Dimensional Optoacoustic Tomography , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Lihong V Wang,et al.  Universal back-projection algorithm for photoacoustic computed tomography , 2005, SPIE BiOS.

[14]  P. Beard Biomedical photoacoustic imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.

[15]  Geng Ku,et al.  Noninvasive photoacoustic angiography of animal brains in vivo with near-infrared light and an optical contrast agent. , 2004, Optics letters.

[16]  James Francis Scholl,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computed Tomographic Imaging Spectrometers (CTIS) Using Fourier and Wavelet Crosstalk Matrices , 2010 .

[17]  A. Oraevsky,et al.  Laser optoacoustic imaging system for detection of breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Wavelet crosstalk matrix and its application to assessment of shift-variant imaging systems , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[19]  Wei Lu,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging of living mouse brain vasculature using hollow gold nanospheres. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[20]  Stephen J. Glick,et al.  Characterization of tomographic sampling in Hybrid PET using the Fourier crosstalk matrix , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Kai Zeng,et al.  3D-SSIM for video quality assessment , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[22]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Multispectral optoacoustic tomography at 64, 128, and 256 channels , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[23]  Xueding Wang,et al.  Limited-view photoacoustic tomography utilizing backscatterers as virtual transducers , 2011 .

[24]  Patrick J. La Rivière,et al.  Photoacoustic image reconstruction using the pseudoinverse of the system matrix with the potential for real time imaging , 2012, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[25]  C. Willmott,et al.  Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance , 2005 .

[26]  T. Erber,et al.  Equilibrium configurations of N equal charges on a sphere , 1991 .

[27]  Eldon Ng,et al.  Analysis of a photoacoustic imaging system by the crosstalk matrix and singular value decomposition. , 2010, Optics express.

[28]  Michael Roumeliotis,et al.  Four-dimensional photoacoustic imaging of moving targets. , 2008, Optics express.

[29]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[30]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey , 2011, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[31]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine , 2006 .

[32]  Chao Tao,et al.  Effects of size and arrangement of virtual transducer on photoacoustic tomography , 2013 .

[33]  V Ntziachristos,et al.  Three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography at video rate. , 2012, Optics express.

[34]  Robert A Kruger,et al.  Photoacoustic angiography of the breast. , 2010, Medical physics.

[35]  Makoto Yamakawa,et al.  Model-Based Reconstruction Integrated With Fluence Compensation for Photoacoustic Tomography , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  S. Emelianov,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging in cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment guidance. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[37]  Jeffrey J. L. Carson,et al.  Measurement of photoacoustic detector sensitivity distribution by robotic source placement , 2008, SPIE BiOS.