Towards MIMO-Aware 802.11n Rate Adaptation

In this paper, we use real experiments to study multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) 802.11n rate adaptation (RA) on a programmable access point (AP) platform. Our case study shows that existing RA solutions offer much lower throughput than even a fixed-rate scheme. It is proven that all such algorithms are MIMO-mode oblivious; they do not differentiate spatial diversity and spatial multiplexing modes. We first design MiRA, a novel MIMO RA scheme that zigzags between intra- and inter-MIMO modes to address MIMO 802.11n dynamics. Second, we examine a window-based RA solution, which runs an independent RA in each MIMO mode in parallel and a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)-based MIMO RA that differentiates modes using SNR measurements. Our experiments show that MIMO-mode aware designs outperform MIMO-mode oblivious RAs in various settings, with goodput gains up to 73.5% in field trials.

[1]  A. M. Abdullah,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1997 .

[2]  Dipankar Raychaudhuri,et al.  Implication of MAC Frame Aggregation on Empirical Wireless Experimentation , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[3]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Understanding and mitigating the impact of RF interference on 802.11 networks , 2007, SIGCOMM '07.

[4]  Peter Steenkiste,et al.  Efficient channel-aware rate adaptation in dynamic environments , 2008, MobiSys '08.

[5]  Haitao Wu,et al.  A Practical SNR-Guided Rate Adaptation , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[6]  Khaled Ben Letaief,et al.  Open-Loop Link Adaptation for Next-Generation IEEE 802.11n Wireless Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  Michael Barton,et al.  Link Adaptation Algorithm for the IEEE 802.11n MIMO System , 2008, Networking.

[8]  Wolfgang Zirwas,et al.  Per-prediction for PHY mode selection in OFDM communication systems , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[9]  Vaduvur Bharghavan,et al.  Robust rate adaptation for 802.11 wireless networks , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[10]  Edward W. Knightly,et al.  Modulation Rate Adaptation in Urban and Vehicular Environments: Cross-Layer Implementation and Experimental Evaluation , 2008, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[11]  Leo Monteban,et al.  WaveLAN®-II: A high-performance wireless LAN for the unlicensed band , 1997, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[12]  Kien T. Truong,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Rate Adaptation for Multi-Antenna Systems , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[13]  Lizhong Zheng,et al.  Diversity and multiplexing: a fundamental tradeoff in multiple-antenna channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[14]  John C. Bicket,et al.  Bit-rate selection in wireless networks , 2005 .

[15]  David Wetherall,et al.  Predictable 802.11 packet delivery from wireless channel measurements , 2010, SIGCOMM '10.

[16]  Wayne E. Stark,et al.  Nonlinear amplifier effects in communications systems , 1999 .

[17]  Dina Katabi,et al.  Frequency-aware rate adaptation and MAC protocols , 2009, MobiCom '09.

[18]  Songwu Lu,et al.  MIMO rate adaptation in 802.11n wireless networks , 2010, MobiCom.

[19]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Switching between diversity and multiplexing in MIMO systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[20]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  Cross-layer wireless bit rate adaptation , 2009, SIGCOMM '09.

[21]  Helmut Bölcskei,et al.  An overview of MIMO communications - a key to gigabit wireless , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Understanding and mitigating the impact of RF interference on 802.11 networks , 2007, SIGCOMM 2007.

[23]  Fei Peng,et al.  Adaptive Modulation and Coding for IEEE 802.11n , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.