Assessing students' integrative learning in biomedical engineering from the perspectives of structure, behavior, and function

Learning in biomedical engineering is highly interdisciplinary: students need to integrate concepts between engineering and life sciences, and be able to design and develop technologies with physiological considerations. In this study, biomedical engineering students' artifacts were analyzed in detail according to the structure-behavior-framework (SBF) framework. The SBF framework has been investigated by educational researchers and learning scientists; in particular, the behavioral and functional dimensions were proved to be related to a sophisticated level of understanding of complex systems. Existing research results also indicate that experts (or expert-like learners) show a deeper understanding of the behavioral and functional aspects of systems. In the current study, a 5-level scale comprising structural, behavioral, and functional dimensions of integrated learning was constructed to assess student learning in a biomedical engineering project course. Our results indicate that high achievers and low achievers were different in the behavioral and functional dimensions. The results also indicate significant relationships between behavioral and functional dimensions of learning and students' final course performance. These findings align with existing results in cognitive science and learning sciences on expert-novice differences, which help connecting engineering educational inquiries to the rich body of literature and findings in human learning.

[1]  J. Froyd,et al.  Integrated Engineering Curricula , 2005 .

[2]  R.A. Foulds,et al.  Integrated biomedical engineering education using studio-based learning , 2003, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[3]  Mary Taylor Huber,et al.  Integrative Learning: Mapping the Terrain. The Academy in Transition. , 2004 .

[4]  A. Collins,et al.  Epistemic forms and Epistemic Games: Structures and Strategies to Guide Inquiry , 1993 .

[5]  Yuen-Yan Chan,et al.  Engineering undergraduates learning computer system modeling in a constructivist learning environment: multilevel analysis of collaborative and individual learning , 2010 .

[6]  John D Enderle,et al.  Ensuring that biomedical engineers are ready for the real world. , 2002, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[7]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Cognitive operations in constructing main points in written composition , 1988 .

[8]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  Robert A Linsenmeier,et al.  What makes a biomedical engineer? , 2003, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[10]  John Heywood,et al.  Engineering Education : Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction , 2005 .

[11]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[12]  Edward E. Anderson,et al.  A Paradigm for Assessing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Engineering Students , 2007 .

[13]  Alfred C. H. Yu,et al.  Towards integrative learning in biomedical engineering: A project course on electrocardiogram monitor design , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[14]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Innovation in Analogical Design: A Model-Based Approach , 1994 .

[15]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Functional Representation of Designs and Redesign Problem Solving , 1989, IJCAI.

[16]  David G. Pollock,et al.  An Investigation of Students' Conceptual Understanding in Related Sophomore to Graduate‐Level Engineering and Mechanics Courses , 2009 .

[17]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  W. C. Newstetter,et al.  Problem-based learning in biomedical engineering curricula , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[19]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Constructive Activity in Learning From Text , 1992 .

[20]  Renita Schmidt.  Book Review: Integrative learning: Mapping the terrain by Mary Taylor Huber and Pat Hutchings (Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2004) , 2008 .