Using Radar Plots to Demonstrate the Accuracy and Precision of 6 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems

Background: Previously, fingertip capillary blood glucose measurements from the CONTOUR®NEXT (CN) blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) and 5 other BGMSs were evaluated in comparison with measurements from a reference YSI glucose analyzer. Here, we use Radar Plots to graphically represent the accuracy and precision results from the previous study, including whether they met ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria. Method: A Radar Plot, a new method for capturing a distinct, single visualization of BGMS analytical performance, is a collection of concentric circles, each representing a particular magnitude of error. The center of the plot represents zero error (BGMS result is equivalent to reference result); as points are more distant from the center, the error increases, expressed in units of mg/dL or percentage for YSI values <100 and ≥100 mg/dL, respectively. The position of the data point above or below the horizontal line bisecting the plot indicates whether the BGMS measurement error was positive (BGMS result > YSI result) or negative (BGMS result < YSI result). Points within the “15-15 Zone,” representing ±15 mg/dL or ±15% error, satisfy ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria. Results: The percentage of results within the 15-15 Zone ranged from 83.6% to 99.8% for the 6 BGMSs (99.6% for CN). Conclusions: Radar Plots provide a different method for visually comparing the analytical performance of multiple BGMSs. The tight clustering of data points at the center of the CN Radar Plot illustrates the analytical performance of CN compared with 5 other BGMSs.

[1]  David A Simmons How Should Blood Glucose Meter System Analytical Performance Be Assessed? , 2015, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[2]  Bern Harrison,et al.  Are blood glucose meters for home use acceptable for making appropriate diabetes management decisions , 2013 .

[3]  Ronald Brazg,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting. , 2015, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[4]  Guido Freckmann,et al.  Strengths and Limitations of New Approaches for Graphical Presentation of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy Data , 2017, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[5]  B H Ginsberg,et al.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[6]  Walter L. Smith Probability and Statistics , 1959, Nature.

[7]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[8]  D. Cox,et al.  Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose , 1987, Diabetes Care.

[9]  L M Thienpont,et al.  Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data? , 1998, Clinical chemistry.

[10]  Boris Kovatchev,et al.  The Surveillance Error Grid , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[11]  Lutz Heinemann,et al.  Comparison of the Numerical and Clinical Accuracy of Four Continuous Glucose Monitors , 2008, Diabetes Care.