Hyper-elastic modelling of intervertebral disc polyurethane implant.

Artificial materials including various kinds of polymers like polyurethanes are more and more widely used in different branches of science and also in biomedical engineering. The paper presents the process of creating a constitutive equation for a polyurethane nanocomposite which is considered to be hyper-elastic. The constitutive modelling was conducted within the range of application of the material as one of the components of lumbar intervertebral disc prosthesis. In the paper, the biomechanics of the lumbar spine and the most frequently applied intervertebral disc prostheses are described. Also a polyurethane nanocomposite as a new material to be applied in prostheses is presented. The way of formulating a constitutive equation by means of mathematical formulae is described. Four various hyper-elastic potential functions are considered, i.e., Ogden, Neo-Hookean, Yeoh and Mooney-Rivlin. On the basis of monotonic compression tests the best hyper-elastic model for the material considered was chosen and hyper-elastic constants were calibrated. Finally, the constitutive model was validated on the basis of FE analysis. The paper ends with a conclusion and presentation of further plans of research directed towards the development of a constitutive equation and its application in computer simulations by means of the finite element method.

[1]  Marek Pawlikowski,et al.  Cortical Bone Tissue Viscoelastic Properties and its Constitutive Equation - Preliminary Studies , 2012 .

[2]  D P Pioletti,et al.  Viscoelastic constitutive law in large deformations: application to human knee ligaments and tendons. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  R. Bertagnoli,et al.  Surgical and clinical results with the PDN® prosthetic disc-nucleus device , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[4]  Ya-Xiang Yuan,et al.  Optimization Theory and Methods: Nonlinear Programming , 2010 .

[5]  C. D. Ray,et al.  Artificial Nucleus Replacement: Clinical Experience , 2002, Spine.

[6]  F. Postacchini,et al.  Results of Disc Prosthesis After a Minimum Follow‐Up Period of 2 Years , 1996, Spine.

[7]  Ya-Xiang Yuan,et al.  Optimization theory and methods , 2006 .

[8]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  Lumbar disc arthroplasty. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  J. Nerubay,et al.  Results of lumbar disk prosthesis after a follow-up period of 48 months. , 2003, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[10]  M. Adams,et al.  Internal Intervertebral Disc Mechanics as Revealed by Stress Profilometry , 1992, Spine.

[11]  B. Vernon‐roberts,et al.  Annular tears and disc degeneration in the lumbar spine. A post-mortem study of 135 discs. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  Ivonne Sgura,et al.  Fitting hyperelastic models to experimental data , 2004 .

[13]  T. Zagrajek,et al.  Finite element analysis of artificial disc with an elastomeric core in the lumbar spine. , 2012, Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics.

[14]  Bryan W Cunningham,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Total Disc Replacement Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model , 2003, Spine.

[15]  Patrick Tropiano,et al.  Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. , 2003 .

[16]  Helmut D. Link,et al.  History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charité artificial disc , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[17]  M. Pawlikowski,et al.  Studies on constitutive equation that models bone tissue. , 2008, Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics.

[18]  W. Akeson,et al.  Biomechanics and biochemistry of the intervertebral disks: the need for correlation studies. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  M. Pope,et al.  Experimental measurements of vertebral motion under load. , 1977, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[20]  S. Rolander.  Motion of the lumbar spine with special reference to the stabilizing effect of posterior fusion. An experimental study on autopsy specimens. , 1966, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[21]  Jeffrey D. Gordon,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of total disc arthroplasty , 2002 .

[22]  J. G. Williams,et al.  Determination of the Constitutive Constants of Non-Linear Viscoelastic Materials , 2004 .

[23]  D G Wilder,et al.  Internal Displacement Distribution from In Vitro Loading of Human Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Motion Segments: Experimental Results and Theoretical Predictions , 1987, Spine.

[24]  M. Kalnins,et al.  Mechanical Properties of High-Density Polyethylene/Chlorinated Polyethylene Blends , 2004 .