Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence

Summary An Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ) was developed, consisting of eight scales on attitudes to and on coping with errors at work. In Study I (representative sample of a German city, Na 478) six scales were developed with the help of a confirmatory factor analysis using LISREL techniques. They comprise error competence, learning from errors, error risk taking, error strain, erroranticipation, covering up errors. All constructs were validated. In a second study, items were added to the scales and two additional scales, ‘error communication’ and ‘thinking about errors’, were included. The scales were translated into English and Dutch and 160 students in the Netherlands filled out both language versions (Study II). The 8-factor solutions in English and Dutch were replicated. The issue of language equivalence of these two language versions were taken up (equivalence across correlations exists). Potentially biasing variables did not influence the solutions. Practical uses of the EOQ are pointed out. Copyright #1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  F. Oort Using Restricted Factor Analysis in Test Construction. , 1992 .

[2]  J. Stevens Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[3]  Y. Poortinga Equivalence of cross-cultural data: an overview of basic issues. , 1989, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[4]  C. Carver,et al.  Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[5]  Mick Bennett RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF BILINGUAL MANAGERS TO ORGANISATIONAL QUESTIONNAIRES1 , 1977 .

[6]  M. Browne,et al.  Cross-Validation Of Covariance Structures. , 1983, Multivariate behavioral research.

[7]  L. Abramson,et al.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser? , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  James Reason,et al.  Human Error , 1990 .

[9]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  M. Frese,et al.  Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. , 1994 .

[11]  V. Hamilton,et al.  Intuitive Psychologist or Intuitive Lawyer? Alternative Models of the Attribution Process , 1980 .

[12]  D. J. Kurpius,et al.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization: Book review. , 1993 .

[13]  Michael Frese,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Goal Orientation and Planfulness: Action Styles as Personality Concepts , 1987 .

[14]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[15]  D. Gerbing,et al.  Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis , 1996 .

[16]  D. Broadbent,et al.  The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. , 1982, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[17]  M. Frese,et al.  "Mir ist es lieber, wenn ich genau gesagt bekomme, was ich tun mu[s": Probleme der Akzeptanz von Verantwortung und Handlungsspielraum in Ost und West. , 1994 .

[18]  Michael Frese,et al.  Error management in training: Conceptual and empirical results , 1995 .

[19]  J. Kuhl,et al.  Motivation, Konflikt und Handlungskontrolle , 1983 .

[20]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: James Stevens: Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. , 1989 .

[21]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Overcoming organizational defenses : facilitating organizational learning , 1990 .

[22]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[23]  Giuseppe De Arcangelis,et al.  Structural equations with latent variables, kenneth a. bollen. john wiley & sons, inc., new york, chichester, brisbane, toronto, singapore, 1989, isbn 0-471-01171-1, £39.90 hardbound, pp. xiv + 514 , 1993 .

[24]  Stephan Dutke,et al.  Error Handling: Visualisations in the Human–Computer Interface and Exploratory Learning , 1994 .

[25]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[26]  A Bandura,et al.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: Cognitive Theory. , 1986 .

[27]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[28]  Thomas J. Peters,et al.  Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution , 1988 .

[29]  Kerstin E. E. Schroder,et al.  The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs : Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the general self-efficacy scale , 1997 .

[30]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[31]  Michael Frese,et al.  Generalized Self Efficacy As a Mediator and Moderator Between Control and Complexity at Work and Personal Initiative: A Longitudinal Field Study in East Germany , 1997 .

[32]  Michael Frese,et al.  Error training: Replication and the function of exploratory behavior , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[33]  Michael Frese,et al.  The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples , 1997 .

[34]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[36]  M. Frese,et al.  Error handling in office work with computers: A field study , 1993 .

[37]  Lisanne Bainbridge,et al.  Ironies of automation , 1982, Autom..

[38]  Michael Frese,et al.  Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany , 1996 .

[39]  Cristina Zucchermaglio,et al.  Organizational Learning and Technological Change , 1995, NATO ASI Series.

[40]  Jochen Prümper,et al.  Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work , 1992 .