Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity.

INTRODUCTION The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) is one of the most widely used questionnaires to assess physical activity (PA). Validation studies for the IPAQ have been executed, but still there is a need for studies comparing absolute values between IPAQ and accelerometer in large population studies. PURPOSE To compare PA and sedentary time from the self-administered, short version of the IPAQ with data from ActiGraph accelerometer in a large national sample. METHODS A total of 1751 adults (19-84 yr) wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT1M) for seven consecutive days and completed the IPAQ-Short Form. Sedentary time, total PA, and time spent in moderate to vigorous activity were compared in relation to sex, age, and education. RESULTS Men and women reported, on average, 131 min·d (SE = 4 min·d) less sedentary time compared with the accelerometer measurements. The difference between self-reported and measured sedentary time and vigorous-intensity PA was greatest among men with a lower education level and for men 65 yr and older. Although men reported 47% more moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) compared with women, there were no differences between sexes in accelerometer-determined MVPA. Accelerometer-determined moderate PA was reduced from 110 to 42 min·d (62%) when analyzed in blocks of 10 min (P < 0.0001) compared with 1-min blocks. The main correlation coefficients between self-reported variables and accelerometer measures of physical activity were between 0.20 and 0.46. CONCLUSIONS The participants report through IPAQ-Short Form more vigorous PA and less sedentary time compared with the accelerometer. The difference between self-reported and accelerometer-measured MVPA increased with higher activity and intensity levels. Associations between the methods were affected by sex, age, and education, but not body mass index.

[1]  H. P. van der Ploeg,et al.  Advances in population surveillance for physical activity and sedentary behavior: reliability and validity of time use surveys. , 2010, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  M. Tremblay,et al.  A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[3]  Duncan J Macfarlane,et al.  Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[4]  N. Okamoto,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in Elderly Adults: The Fujiwara-kyo Study , 2011, Journal of epidemiology.

[5]  S. Anderssen,et al.  Accelerometer-determined physical activity in adults and older people. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  Heikki Kyröläinen,et al.  International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Validity against fitness. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Comparison of a subjective and an objective measure of physical activity in a population sample. , 2010, Journal of physical activity & health.

[8]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Criterion-related validity of the last 7-day, short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Swedish adults , 2006, Public Health Nutrition.

[9]  M. Hagströmer,et al.  The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity , 2006, Public Health Nutrition.

[10]  Kerry Mummery,et al.  Method: Comparison of surveys used to measure physical activity , 2004, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[11]  Mikael Fogelholm,et al.  [Nordic nutrition recommendations]. , 2006, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[12]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  W. Mechelen,et al.  Physical Activity Questionnaires for Youth , 2010, Sports medicine.

[14]  Charles E Matthew,et al.  Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  S. Stewart,et al.  Performance of the international physical activity questionnaire (short form) in subgroups of the Hong Kong chinese population , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[16]  Vegar Rangul,et al.  Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire in the Nord-Trøndelag health study (HUNT) population of men , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[17]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  The International Prevalence Study on Physical Activity: results from 20 countries , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[18]  Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[19]  A. Bauman,et al.  Health-enhancing physical activity across European Union countries: the Eurobarometer study , 2006, Journal of Public Health.

[20]  Caroline B. Terwee,et al.  Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults , 2010, Sports medicine.

[21]  Maria Hagströmer,et al.  Levels and patterns of objectively assessed physical activity--a comparison between Sweden and the United States. , 2010, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  Sanjay Kalra,et al.  OBJECTIVELY MEASURED LIGHT‐INTENSITY PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IS INDEPENDENTLY ASSOCIATED WITH 2‐H PLASMA GLUCOSE , 2008 .

[23]  M. Sjöström,et al.  Physical activity monitoring in Europe. The European Physical Activity Surveillance System (EUPASS) approach and indicator testing , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[24]  Maria Hagströmer,et al.  The descriptive epidemiology of sitting. A 20-country comparison using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[25]  T. Jørgensen,et al.  Validation of a new self-report instrument for measuring physical activity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[27]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Progress and pitfalls in the use of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) for adult physical activity surveillance. , 2009, Journal of physical activity & health.

[28]  W. Mechelen,et al.  Self-Administered Physical Activity Questionnaires for the Elderly , 2010, Sports medicine.

[29]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Field Validation of the MTI Actigraph and BodyMedia Armband Monitor Using the IDEEA Monitor , 2007, Obesity.

[30]  P. Freedson,et al.  Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  L. Mâsse,et al.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[32]  C. Matthews,et al.  Validation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short among Blacks. , 2008, Journal of physical activity & health.

[33]  D. Altman,et al.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.