Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiparetic stroke: a multicenter feasibility study of safety and efficacy.

OBJECT In this prospective multicenter study the authors hypothesized that investigational epidural cortical stimulation (CS) delivered concurrently with rehabilitation therapy may enhance motor recovery following stroke. METHODS Patients who had suffered their index stroke >or= 4 months previously were randomized into 6 weeks of rehabilitation therapy with or without CS. Cortical stimulation, targeted by functional imaging, was delivered at approximately 50% of motor movement threshold. Primary outcome measures were Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM [a measure of neurological and motor function]) and Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT [a measure of activities of daily living]) scores. The primary study end point was 4 weeks following rehabilitation therapy. RESULTS A total of 24 patients, 12 per group, completed the treatment protocol. The mean interval since the patients' index stroke was 33 months (range 4-100 months). There were no deaths or cases of neurological deterioration; 1 acute postoperative seizure occurred unrelated to the device or treatment. Patients who underwent CS experienced improved hand/arm function more than control patients. The UEFM score improved 5.5 +/- 4.4 points in patients in the CS group compared with 1.9 +/- 4.4 points for controls (p = 0.03). A 3.5-point UEFM improvement is considered clinically meaningful. The AMAT scores for the CS group improved by 0.4 +/- 0.6 points, whereas the scores in the control group improved by 0.2 +/- 0.4 points (p = 0.2). A 0.21-point improvement in AMAT score is considered clinically meaningful. In the CS group, 67% of patients had clinically meaningful improvement in UEFM scores, compared with 25% of the control group (p = 0.05). Of patients in the CS group 50% had clinically meaningful improvement in UEFM as well as AMAT scores, compared with only 8% of those in the control group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that subthreshold epidural CS is safe and effective during rehabilitation for recovery of arm and hand function following hemiparetic stroke. Further research in a larger cohort is needed to validate the therapeutic effect.

[1]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  Upper extremity function in hemiplegia. A cross-validation study of two assessment methods. , 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.

[2]  M. Dodgson,et al.  Editorial , 2009 .

[3]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[4]  R. Edwards,et al.  Conservative Management of Patients with Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt Infections , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[5]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Motor Cortex Stimulation for the Enhancement of Recovery from Stroke: A Prospective, Multicenter Safety Study , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[6]  J. Kleim,et al.  Motor cortex stimulation enhances motor recovery and reduces peri-infarct dysfunction following ischemic insult , 2003, Neurological research.

[7]  Ann M. Stowe,et al.  Post-infarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery using concurrent cortical stimulation and rehabilitative training: A feasibility study in primates , 2003, Neurological research.

[8]  N. Young,et al.  Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat , 2003, Neurological research.

[9]  T. Jones,et al.  Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: Enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats , 2003, Neurological research.

[10]  Angelo Franzini,et al.  Chronic motor cortex stimulation for movement disorders: A promising perspective , 2003, Neurological research.

[11]  John Chae,et al.  Upper Limb Motor Function in Hemiparesis: Concurrent Validity of the Arm Motor Ability Test , 2003, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[12]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  P Mertens,et al.  Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: a combined PET-scan and electrophysiological study , 1999, PAIN.

[14]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[15]  E. Bézard,et al.  Cortical stimulation and epileptic seizure: a study of the potential risk in primates. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[16]  T. Yamamoto,et al.  Poststroke pain control by chronic motor cortex stimulation: neurological characteristics predicting a favorable response. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  C. Geny,et al.  Improvement of action tremor by chronic cortical stimulation , 1998, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[18]  N. Rainov,et al.  Epidural electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in patients with facial neuralgia , 1997, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[19]  Y. Katayama,et al.  Pharmacological classification of central post-stroke pain: comparison with the results of chronic motor cortex stimulation therapy , 1997, PAIN.

[20]  H. Flor,et al.  The Arm Motor Ability Test: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  M. Deiber,et al.  Electrical stimulation of precentral cortical area in the treatment of central pain: electrophysiological and PET study , 1995, Pain.

[22]  P. Stratford,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[23]  T Hirayama,et al.  Chronic motor cortex stimulation in patients with thalamic pain. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  Y. Katayama,et al.  Treatment of Thalamic Pain by Chronic Motor Cortex Stimulation , 1991, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[25]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  R. Moser The Heart, Arteries, and Veins, ed 2. , 1971 .

[27]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Positron emission tomography during motor cortex stimulation for pain control. , 1997, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[28]  C. Fukaya,et al.  Control of poststroke involuntary and voluntary movement disorders with deep brain or epidural cortical stimulation. , 1997, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[29]  J. Nguyen,et al.  Treatment of deafferentation pain by chronic stimulation of the motor cortex: report of a series of 20 cases. , 1997, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[30]  T. Yamamoto,et al.  Chronic motor cortex stimulation for central deafferentation pain: experience with bulbar pain secondary to Wallenberg syndrome. , 1994, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[31]  Y. Hosobuchi Motor cortical stimulation for control of central deafferentation pain. , 1993, Advances in neurology.

[32]  U. Lindblom,et al.  Motor cortex stimulation as treatment of trigeminal neuropathic pain. , 1993, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[33]  T Hirayama,et al.  Chronic motor cortex stimulation for the treatment of central pain. , 1991, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.