Life cycle assessment and optimization analysis of different LNG usage scenarios

PurposeThis paper aims to compare the environmental impacts of LNG in different life cycle stages and for various usages by applying life cycle assessment (LCA). According to different usage processes, we set three scenarios including S1-hydrogen production, S2-electricity generation, and S3-vehicle fuel to evaluate their environmental impacts. Furthermore, in order to satisfy better city development, an optimization analysis was made to identify the optimal distribution structure of LNG.MethodsThe environmental impact analysis of LNG was conducted using life cycle assessment and CML2001 method. LCA was performed based on the ISO 14040 standard using GaBi 5.0 software. Four impact categories (i.e., global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), and photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP)) were considered. Sensitivity analysis was also made by means of GaBi 5.0 software. Crystal Ball software was applied to make the optimization analysis for different LNG usage scenarios. The minimum environmental impact factor was taken as the objective function to confirm the optimal distribution structure of LNG.Results and discussionThe LCA results indicate that the environmental impacts of the gasification and usage stages far outweigh that of the transportation stage, and the highest environmental impact category for each scenario is GWP. The largest contribution factor to GWP of S1 is the production supply of imported electricity, whereas the largest contribution factor to GWP of S2 and S3 is the emissions. The optimization analysis indicate that when imported LNG is allocated 25% for hydrogen production, 73% for electricity generation and 2% for vehicle fuel, the GWP and cost of the total LNG usage are both minimum.ConclusionsEnvironmental analysis on different LNG usage scenarios allows the identification and selection of comprehensive LNG usage plans with the minimum environment impacts and lowest cost. For different LNG usage scenarios, the GWP of LNG used for vehicle fuel is the highest and for hydrogen production is the lowest. The production supply of imported electricity and the emissions are the two largest contribution factors to LCA results as well as the sensitivity analysis results of the three scenarios. The optimization analysis method and results can provide technology reference for scientific urban planning of LNG application and allocation.

[1]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of natural gas combined cycle power plant with post-combustion carbon capture, transport and storage , 2011 .

[2]  Timothy J Skone,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis: Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) Power Plants , 2012 .

[3]  Diego Iribarren,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrogen energy systems: a review of methodological choices , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Life cycle assessment of natural gas power plants in Thailand , 2009 .

[5]  Dorota Burchart-Korol,et al.  Life cycle assessment of heat production from underground coal gasification , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[6]  Wojciech Stanek,et al.  Application of the Stirling engine driven with cryogenic exergy of LNG (liquefied natural gas) for the production of electricity , 2016 .

[7]  Paul Jonathan Barnett,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and its environmental impact as a low carbon energy source , 2010 .

[8]  Amir Safaei,et al.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas assessment of Nigerian liquefied natural gas addressing uncertainty. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  E. Fridell,et al.  Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol , 2014 .

[10]  Cnooc Gas Life cycle assessment of carbon emission from synthetic natural gas(SNG) and its horizontal comparison analysis , 2010 .

[11]  C.C.H.Th. Daey Ouwens Alternative energy sources , 1975 .

[12]  Wu Rui A EEE and Life Cycle Assessment of Four Natural Gas Based Automotive Fuels , 2004 .

[13]  Lou Diming Life Cycle Energy and Environment Assessment of Gasoline and Its Alternative Fuels , 2007 .

[14]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional and new fused magnesia production , 2015 .

[15]  Seyfi Şevik,et al.  An analysis of the current and future use of natural gas-fired power plants in meeting electricity energy needs: The case of Turkey , 2015 .

[16]  Trevor Pryor,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of diesel, natural gas and hydrogen fuel cell bus transportation systems , 2007 .

[17]  Garvin A. Heath,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from Barnett Shale gas used to generate electricity , 2014 .

[18]  Cristian Dinca,et al.  A life cycle impact of the natural gas used in the energy sector in Romania , 2007 .

[19]  S. Ryding ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[20]  Calin-Cristian Cormos,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Natural Gas-based Chemical Looping for Hydrogen Production☆ , 2014 .

[21]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Optimal greenhouse gas emissions in NGCC plants integrating life cycle assessment , 2012 .

[22]  Anna Lewandowska,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy generation in Poland , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  Fabio Polonara,et al.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis of LNG as a heavy vehicle fuel in Europe , 2010 .

[24]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[25]  Suresh Jain,et al.  A life cycle environmental impact assessment of natural gas combined cycle thermal power plant in Andhra Pradesh, India , 2014 .

[26]  Paulina J Aramillo,et al.  Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation. , 2007 .