Using spatial context to improve early detection of deforestation from Landsat time series

Mapping deforestation using medium spatial resolution satellite data (e.g. Landsat) is increasingly shifting from decadal and annual scales to sub-annual scales in recent years, but this shift has brought new challenges on how to account for seasonality in the satellite data when detecting deforestation. A seasonal model is typically used to account for seasonality, but fitting a seasonal model is difficult when there are not enough data in the time series. Here, we propose a new approach that reduces seasonality in satellite image time series using spatial context. With this spatial context approach, each pixel value in the image is spatially normalised using the median value calculated from neighbouring pixels whose pixel values are above the 90th percentile. Using Landsat data, we compared our spatial context approach to a seasonal model approach at a humid tropical forest in Brazil and a dry tropical forest with strong seasonality in Bolivia. After reducing seasonal variations in Landsat data, we detected deforestation from the same data using the Breaks For Additive Season and Trend (BFAST) method. We show that, in dry tropical forest, deforestation events are detected much earlier when the spatial context approach is used to reduce seasonal variations in Landsat data than when a seasonal model is used. In the dry tropical forest, the median temporal detection delay for deforestation from the spatial context approach was two observations, seven times shorter than the median temporal detection delay from the seasonal model approach (15 observations). In the humid tropical forest, the difference in the temporal detection delay between the spatial context and seasonal model approach was not significant. The differences in overall spatial accuracy between the spatial context and seasonal model were also not significant in both dry and humid tropical forests. The main benefit for using spatial context is early detection of deforestation events in forests with strong seasonality. Therefore, the spatial context approach we propose here provides opportunity to monitor deforestation events in dry tropical forests at sub-annual scales using Landsat data.

[1]  W. Verstraeten,et al.  A comparison of time series similarity measures for classification and change detection of ecosystem dynamics , 2011 .

[2]  Zhiqiang Yang,et al.  Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr — Temporal segmentation algorithms , 2010 .

[3]  C. Tucker Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[4]  M. Herold,et al.  Robust monitoring of small-scale forest disturbances in a tropical montane forest using Landsat time series , 2015 .

[5]  Rob J Hyndman,et al.  Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series , 2010 .

[6]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Monitoring Structural Change in Dynamic Econometric Models , 2002 .

[7]  E. B. Wilson Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference , 1927 .

[8]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data , 2014 .

[9]  Rob J Hyndman,et al.  Phenological change detection while accounting for abrupt and gradual trends in satellite image time series , 2010 .

[10]  G. Asner,et al.  Cloud cover in Landsat observations of the Brazilian Amazon , 2001 .

[11]  H. White,et al.  Monitoring Structural Change , 1996 .

[12]  Zhe Zhu,et al.  Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery , 2012 .

[13]  Jan Verbesselt,et al.  Trends in Spring Phenology of Western European Deciduous Forests , 2013, Remote Sensing.

[14]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Using annual time-series of Landsat images to assess the effects of forest restitution in post-socialist Romania , 2012 .

[15]  M. Herold,et al.  Fusing Landsat and SAR time series to detect deforestation in the tropics , 2015 .

[16]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change , 2014 .

[17]  Jan Verbesselt,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Combine Landsat and ALOS PALSAR Time Series for Near Real-Time Deforestation Detection , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Dar A. Roberts,et al.  Ten-Year Landsat Classification of Deforestation and Forest Degradation in the Brazilian Amazon , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[19]  E. Lindquist,et al.  Multiple remote sensing data sources for REDD+ monitoring , 2012 .

[20]  Warren B. Cohen,et al.  Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 2. TimeSync — Tools for calibration and validation , 2010 .

[21]  F. Achard,et al.  Determination of tropical deforestation rates and related carbon losses from 1990 to 2010 , 2014, Global change biology.

[22]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Global, 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: Landsat-based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidar-based estimates of error , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[23]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Testing, monitoring, and dating structural changes in exchange rate regimes , 2010, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[24]  M. Herold,et al.  Monitoring forest cover loss using multiple data streams, a case study of a tropical dry forest in Bolivia , 2015 .

[25]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  MONITORING STRUCTURAL CHANGES WITH THE GENERALIZED FLUCTUATION TEST , 2000, Econometric Theory.

[26]  Christopher Justice,et al.  Towards a Generalized Approach for Correction of the BRDF Effect in MODIS Directional Reflectances , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  M. Herold,et al.  Near real-time disturbance detection using satellite image time series , 2012 .

[28]  Irma J. Terpenning,et al.  STL : A Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess , 1990 .

[29]  Jixian Zhang Multi-source remote sensing data fusion: status and trends , 2010 .