An Efficient Greedy Traffic Aware Routing Scheme for Internet of Vehicles

A new paradigm of VANET has emerged in recent years: Internet of Vehicles (IoV). These networks are formed on the roads and streets between travellers who have relationships, interactions and common social interests. Users of these networks exchange information of common interest, for example, traffic jams and dangers on the way. They can also exchange files such as multimedia files. IoV is considered as part of the Internet of Things (IoT) where objects are vehicles, which can create a multitude of services dedicated to the intelligent transportation system. The interest is to permit to all connected vehicles to communicate with each other and/or with a central server, through other vehicles. Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) communication is the main component, because the services encompassed in the IoV are based on the vehicles in question, such as transmitter, relay and receiver. This work is focusing on designing and developing a Quality of Service (QoS) routing scheme dedicated to IoV networks. Especially, we aim to improve the Greedy Traffic Aware Routing (GyTAR) protocol to support QoS in IoV networks. To evaluate the proposed approach in terms of QoS in the context of IoV networks, the performance metrics such as average end-to-end delay and packet delivery ratio are taken into consideration to analyse the network situation.

[1]  Tinku Mohamed Rasheed,et al.  An Infrastructure-Free Traffic Information System for Vehicular Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[2]  Saad Mustafa,et al.  Impact of directional density on GyTAR routing protocol for VANETs in city environments , 2011, 2011 IEEE 14th International Multitopic Conference.

[3]  Hassan Artail,et al.  We Can Deliver Messages to Far Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Jian Ming Huang,et al.  Research on Internet of Vehicles and its Application in Intelligent Transportation , 2013 .

[5]  Abdulmotaleb El-Saddik,et al.  How Close are We to Realizing a Pragmatic VANET Solution? A Meta-Survey , 2015, ACM Comput. Surv..

[6]  Stefan Poslad,et al.  A Traffic-aware Resource Allocation Scheme for Internet of Vehicles: A Supply and Demand Function Approach , 2015 .

[7]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Routing in Internet of Vehicles: A Review , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[8]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Mobile Crowd Sensing for Traffic Prediction in Internet of Vehicles , 2016, Sensors.

[9]  S. S. Dorle,et al.  Heterogeneous Approaches for Cluster based Routing Protocol in Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET) , 2016 .

[10]  Jiafu Wan,et al.  A survey on position-based routing for vehicular ad hoc networks , 2015, Telecommunication Systems.

[11]  Vishal Kumar,et al.  Priority based data scheduling in VANETs , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering (ICACCE).

[12]  Ch. Ramesh Babu,et al.  Internet of Vehicles: From Intelligent Grid to Autonomous Cars and Vehicular Clouds , 2016 .

[13]  Chin-Teng Lin,et al.  Internet of Vehicles: Motivation, Layered Architecture, Network Model, Challenges, and Future Aspects , 2016, IEEE Access.

[14]  Sanjeev Jain,et al.  A survey on device-to-device (D2D) communication: Architecture and security issues , 2017, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[15]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Internet of Vehicles: Enabling safe, secure, and private vehicular crowdsourcing , 2018, Internet Technol. Lett..

[16]  Belghachi Mohammed,et al.  Greedy Traffic Aware Routing Protocol Implementation in the Context of Internet of Vehicles , 2018 .

[17]  Makhlouf Aliouat,et al.  Toward a hybrid SDN architecture for V2V communication in IoV environment , 2018, 2018 Fifth International Conference on Software Defined Systems (SDS).